[Bioc-devel] Rhtslib on arm64

Martin Grigorov mgr|gorov @end|ng |rom @p@che@org
Wed Jun 7 12:04:27 CEST 2023


Hi Ulrich,

The issue with the LOCK files and folders have been addressed with
https://github.com/Bioconductor/BBS/pull/291
https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.17/bioc-mac-arm64-LATEST/Rhtslib/kjohnson2-install.html
says "This page was generated on 2023-06-02 11:02:20". I guess the issue
will be gone with the next report.

In addition I could say that Rhtslib builds fine on Linux ARM64 -
https://bio-arm.github.io/latest/report/Rhtslib/

Regards,
Martin



On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:29 PM <bodenhofer using bioinf.jku.at> wrote:

> Dear Hervé, dear Rhtslib developers, dear BioC core team,
>
> I am regularly checking all BioC check results in order to make sure that I
> do not miss any issues of the four Bioconductor packages that I am
> maintaining. It seems that the ‘podkat’ package in BioC 3.17 release has
> not
> been built for arm64 yet. On the results page
> https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.17/bioc-mac-arm64-LATEST/,
> ‘podkat’
> has been “red” for weeks now. It seems to me that the reason for this is
> that ‘Rhtslib’ does not build either. I have now looked at the results page
> of ‘Rhtslib’
> (https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.17/bioc-mac-arm64-LATEST/Rhtslib/
> )
> and it seems that it is a simple issue with a lock file on the build
> server,
> but not a major problem why the package is not built (who knows, but I
> suppose so). I am therefore asking if anybody is able to resolve that issue
> such that the ‘Rhtslib’ package builds for arm64 and , as a consequence,
> hopefully, my ‘podkat’ package too.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance and best regards,
> Ulrich
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list