[Bioc-devel] build/check reports and package version available for updated package

[Ramon Diaz-Uriarte]

Hi Herve,

Thanks a lot for the explanation; mystery solved. And yes, I can now see
the updated report.


Best,


R.


On Sat, 09-February-2019, at 10:54:40, Pages, Herve <hpages using fredhutch.org> wrote:
> Hi Ramon,
>
> We run the software builds every night and normally the build report
> gets updated every morning (for the people on the East Coast). However
> sometimes things don't work as expected. This time the builds went fine
> but the script that updates the report failed so that's why we still see
> the report from the day before. However, it seems that OncoSimulR 2.13.1
> passed 'R CMD check' on all platforms and propagated so this is why you
> see it on the package landing page.
>
> I addressed the issue with the script so hopefully the report will get
> updated today around 10 am EST. We should see OncoSimulR 2.13.1 on this
> new report.
>
> Best,
>
> H.
>
> On 2/9/19 01:13, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> For the development version of a package, I thought that a new version of a
>> package (a new version of the archive) was only made available if and when
>> the build/check reports had been passed (for the corresponding OS). But now
>> I think I am wrong.
>>
>>
>> For a package I maintain, OncoSimulR, I am seeing package archives for the
>> new version (2.13.1) that correspond to the changes I pushed a couple of
>> days ago, on 2019-02-07
>> (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bioconductor.org_packages_3.9_bioc_html_OncoSimulR.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=O0cn-X5Sr3_HhPWuSmTxh06I6kzACAP-AsUKsDNCnEU&s=y8Ni6d5RDqXiSzMWYbsOa6z3CQCHAnB7ViGb_iYe70Y&e=); but the
>> build report
>> (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bioconductor.org_checkResults_3.9_bioc-2DLATEST_OncoSimulR_&d=DwIDaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=O0cn-X5Sr3_HhPWuSmTxh06I6kzACAP-AsUKsDNCnEU&s=rYQOEwOloojsIaUf3cwDap2VkbgGYyzQjuXOcHMFVmI&e=) is
>> still showing the build/check from the previous version (2.13.0), which was
>> the one that existed at the time of the snapshot date (2019-02-06 17:01:03
>> -0500) of the report.
>>
>>
>> Does this mean that a build bin was executed (I presume successfully)
>> shortly after I pushed changes? I think it must, given the "Packaged" stamp
>> in the DESCRIPTION file of the three compressed files (which shows
>> "2019-02-08 01:19:24 UTC; biocbuild" and similar strings). What about the
>> install and check tests?
>>
>>
>> Sorry if this has been explained before. I've looked around but could not
>> find any info about it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> R.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
>> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
>> Facultad de Medicina
>> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
>> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
>> 28029 Madrid
>> Spain
>>
>> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>>
>> Email: rdiaz02 using gmail.com
>>         ramon.diaz using iib.uam.es
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ligarto.org_rdiaz&d=DwIDaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=O0cn-X5Sr3_HhPWuSmTxh06I6kzACAP-AsUKsDNCnEU&s=lwENxLhyf-d-fQHkWDDmw2N9LcJ9lgfIY10F4SMCJx8&e=
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIDaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=O0cn-X5Sr3_HhPWuSmTxh06I6kzACAP-AsUKsDNCnEU&s=BpOP1oelpZxdAeeLjqgmTXtZNUxHirmC3nDujcXKJeo&e=


--
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
Facultad de Medicina
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
28029 Madrid
Spain

Phone: +34-91-497-2412

Email: rdiaz02 using gmail.com
       ramon.diaz using iib.uam.es

http://ligarto.org/rdiaz