[Bioc-devel] package review help

[Tim Triche, Jr.]

the JOSS process is a nice template that could be expanded and potentially
"crowdsourced" without causing chaos (by virtue of its items being mostly
independent of each other):

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/27#issue-159802506


--t

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com
> wrote:

> I have been chipping in here and there, but I'm not sure if I'm
> causing more confusion than help. I just select packages that interest
> me and contribute bite size pieces, but I would be happy to assume a
> more formal role. It takes very little of my time.
>
> One suggestion is that reviews should be incremental, i.e., provide
> obvious feedback first, let the package authors respond, then dig
> deeper for more detailed comments.
>
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
> <kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > One of the advantages of the Github review process is open review.  We
> have
> > some amount of packages submitted in the last moment (and I am guilty of
> > one of these).  Is help with the reviews needed?  If so, how do we know
> > where to concentrate?
> >
> > Kasper
> >
> >         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]