[Bioc-devel] submitting annotation and data package

[Martin Morgan]

On 06/14/2016 10:10 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> In my case its an annotation package thats >100MB.  But I could imagine
> experiment package doing that as well.

very large packages don't play well with SVN or the repository, e.g., 
placing storage burden on repository mirrors. ExperimentHub might be a 
better, emerging, solution...

Martin

>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Dan Tenenbaum <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Actually, here is the process for experiment packages:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-related-packages
>>
>> Not sure what to do if there is a file > 100MB. There is git/github large
>> file storage but we don't explicitly support it.
>> Maybe it belongs in ExperimentHub instead?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
>>> To: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" <kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: "bioc-devel" <bioc-devel at r-project.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 7:02:25 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] submitting annotation and data package
>>
>>> For annotation packages, see this:
>>>
>>>
>> https://bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/#annotation-packages
>>>
>>> For experiment packages, I'm not sure.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" <kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "bioc-devel" <bioc-devel at r-project.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:28:06 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] submitting annotation and data package
>>>
>>>> Also, just a point, GitHub does not allow files >100MB.  That is a
>>>> non-issue (I hope) for software packages, but could be hit by annotation
>>>> packages, including one I maintain
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <
>>>> kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Should I submit a new annotation and a new data package through the new
>>>>> GitHub interface, or use something differently?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Kasper
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}