[Bioc-devel] Quick question about result of R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck

Jurat Shayidin juratbupt at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 13:17:42 CET 2016

Dear BiocDevel :

I got confused about the message from R CMD BiocCheck, and R CMD check on
my packages. Precisely speaking, R CMD check throws an error that my unit
test is failed, zero warning, 2 notes; instead R CMD BiocCheck complain
with one error that no runnable example found, one warning (I don't
undersand this warning, becuase R CMD check doesn't report this), 4 notes.
I don't understand the result of R CMD BiocCheck, can't figure out the
exact issue . However, result of R CMD check is more clear and
self-explanatory. I did add example for each of my function, R CMD check
okay with it, but R CMD BiocCheck complain about this, Why ? How to address
the issues raised by R CMD BiocCheck ?  R CMD BiocCheck gave me following
message :

[1] "At least 80% of man pages documenting exported objects must have
runnable examples. The following pages do not:"

[1] "Add non-empty \\value sections to the following man pages:

Plus, I tried to attach bibliography.bib files on my package's vignette,
but Rstudio didn't print out the bibliography information at the end of
.Rmd file. How can I make this happen ? I did push all recent changes to
github <https://github.com/julaiti/MSPC>, so everything is synchronized. Is
that possible to kindly ask Bioconductor team to briefly review my packages
and getting valuable opinion to improve my work? I am grad students and
very few experiences in Bioinformatics field (not in this major), so my
very first R package might have a lot of issues, getting possible
contribution would be highly appreciated. Many thanks to Bioconductor team.

Best regards :

Jurat Shahidin

Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria
Politecnico di Milano
Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy
Mobile : +39 3279366608 <+39%20327%20936%206608>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list