mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 20:46:21 CEST 2012
I'm kind of partial to testthat myself, but ...
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Paul Shannon <pshannon at fhcrc.org> wrote:
> Hi Kasper,
> Good timing on this question. I presented a draft 'Unit Testing Guidelines' web page to the dev-team yesterday afternoon.
> I will polish up that draft, add it to the Bioc website later today, and send out a notice once it is ready.
> Yes, we are pretty happy with RUnit. And I believe that the build report almost always gives one a clear enough idea to figure out what is going on.
> - Paul
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
>> I want to add some more testing to my packages. It seems the Seattle
>> team are using RUnit. Are people happy with this? In case a unit
>> test fails during the daily build on the Bioc servers, is the reported
>> output on the web interface good enough that it is clear what is
>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
| Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
| Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact
More information about the Bioc-devel