[Bioc-devel] testing

Steve Lianoglou mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 20:46:21 CEST 2012


Hi,

I'm kind of partial to testthat myself, but ...

-steve

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Paul Shannon <pshannon at fhcrc.org> wrote:
> Hi Kasper,
>
> Good timing on this question.  I presented a draft 'Unit Testing Guidelines' web page to the dev-team yesterday afternoon.
> I will polish up that draft, add it to the Bioc website later today, and send out a notice once it is ready.
>
> Yes, we are pretty happy with RUnit.  And I believe that the build report almost always gives one a clear enough idea to figure out what is going on.
>
>  - Paul
>
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
>
>> I want to add some more testing to my packages.  It seems the Seattle
>> team are using RUnit.  Are people happy with this?  In case a unit
>> test fails during the daily build on the Bioc servers, is the reported
>> output on the web interface good enough that it is clear what is
>> happening?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kasper
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel



-- 
Steve Lianoglou
Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
 | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
 | Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact



More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list