[Bioc-devel] Boost as build dependency ?
Steffen Neumann
sneumann at ipb-halle.de
Wed Feb 25 23:56:05 CET 2009
[In Response to https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2009-February/001806.html]
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 12:37 +0100, Steffen Neumann wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 17:51 -0800, Patrick Aboyoun wrote:
> > I hadn't done a survey of BOOST usage in BioC packages. It does look
> > like we have hit critical mass for BOOST usage. Perhaps the developers
> > of RBGL, bgx, BGmix and Steffen could get together to make a lightweight
> > "RBOOST" package that they could all link to.
I have started an RBOOST package. It's currently living at
http://msbi.ipb-halle.de/~sneumann/RBOOST.tgz
and contains an untarred boot-1.38.0
R CMD INSTALL RBOOST will build and install the headers
and a subset of boost libraries into the RBOOST package:
BOOST_DIRS="--includedir=${R_PACKAGE_DIR}/include --libdir=${R_PACKAGE_DIR}/libs"
BOOST_LIBS="--with-filesystem --with-iostreams --with-regex --with-system"
BOOST_CONF="--user-config=user-config.jam --layout=system link=shared"
$BJAM ${BOOST_CONF} ${BOOST_DIRS} ${BOOST_LIBS} install
The depending packages should have in their DESCRIPTION:
...
LinkingTo: RBOOST
...
to be able to pick up the headers. Linking is a bit more difficult,
and I am not sure I got the best way described in:
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Linking-to-other-packages
Currently my src/Makevars contains the following hack,
although I feel that if I want to make the boost stuff
optional and more generic, a configure.in would be the way to go:
RBOOST_DIR=`echo 'library(RBOOST); cat(system.file("libs", package="RBOOST"))' | ${R_HOME}/bin/R --vanilla --no-save --slave`
RBOOST_LIBS=-L"$(RBOOST_LIB)" \
-lboost_filesystem-mt -lboost_iostreams-mt \
-lboost_regex-mt -lboost_system-mt
Comments ?
Yours,
Steffen
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list