[Bioc-devel] Updated check results page

Robert Gentleman rgentlem at fhcrc.org
Fri Nov 11 03:50:42 CET 2005

Herve Pages wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> Robert Gentleman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  one preference I have is for the ERROR and WARNING glyphs to be like 
>> the MISSING ones, red with white letters. I find that easier to read 
>> (and wonder if OK should not also be green with white letters?)
> I've changed the CSS file for format A to have the "OK" glyphs
> white on green background. Do you like it better?
> I can do the same kind of change for the "ERROR" and "WARNINGS"
> glyphs too.

  I do - and would like ERROR and WARNING to change - at least for me, I 
find them hard to read as they are now

>> I see a single svn value on the page, is that maintainable? Are all 
>> platforms built off the same checkout?
> Yes, all packages are built off the same checkout.
> And all the builds/checks on all nodes are made with the same R (same 
> rev. numer
> too). I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "is it maintainable?"...

   can we keep all in sync? Sometimes we may want to report a Linux 
build off a new checkout, but have not finished the windows build etc? 
So then what do we do? Keep the new builds off line until we can build 
on all platforms?

>> otherwise a nice change
> Glad you like it. Thanks!

  I do - there is a lot more detail in the outputs and hopefully 
developers will find this useful


> Hervé

Robert Gentleman, PhD
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876
PO Box 19024
Seattle, Washington 98109-1024
rgentlem at fhcrc.org

More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list