Package fCalendar_260.72.tar.gz did not pass R CMD check

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 5 February 2008 at 18:08, Yohan Chalabi wrote:
| Question : Should we submit the new version of fCalendar or fix the
| error in fCalendar 260.72 and submit it as 260.73? 
| 
| I would vote for the new version of fCalendar because we also fixed
| problems in DST tables and in holidays functions.

Either way an actual upload would be a huge improvement over the existing
scheme of 'lots of packages twice a year and silence in-between'.

If it were up to me I'd say roll up the SVN version if it passes the unit
tests and R CMD check etc pp.

Dirk

-- 
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.