[R-wiki] R as a programming language
paul sorenson
sourceforge at metrak.com
Sat Jan 28 21:02:25 CET 2006
Ironically I have found R to be a challenge to learn partly because it
is quite different from more "familiar" programming languages, and I
have learnt quite a variety. I guess the other reason is because I know
so little about statistics.
I don't disagree with your suggestion but I find it is the nuances of R
that you just have to learn - the broad concepts aren't really a problem
for me personally. For example, having picked up a copy of MASS
recently, the diagram that shows how all the graphical parameters fit
together was worth a thousand posts on r-help.
Another area that a wiki would have helped for me is some tutorial style
material on the formula syntax and how it is used differently in
different contexts etc.
Of course I may not be your "target market" but that is my 2 cents worth.
cheers
Patrick Burns wrote:
> In gathering opinions relative to the UCLA tech report,
> it seems that part of the difficulty of learning R is that it
> is a programming language. This comes both from Jon
> Baron and from a SAS/R user with no programming
> background.
More information about the R-sig-wiki
mailing list