The preferred idiom is coef(summary(fittedmodel)).  This works for all the
usual suspects, lm, glm, lmer, ...


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Joehanes, Roby (NIH/NHLBI) [F] <
roby.joehanes@nih.gov> wrote:

> Congratulations!
>
> I noticed that the announcement says that direct extraction of slots via @
> no longer works. Does getME offer extraction of the coefficient table
> (i.e., the betas, standard errors, and T-values)? I used result@coefs (in
> the old version) or result$coef (in the beta version). I understand that
> this is discouraged, but I had no other way to extract S.E.s and T-values.
> Is there an equivalent method?
>
> Thanks,
> Roby
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/24/13 3:46 PM, "Ben Bolker" <bbolker@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Carl Von Ende <cvonende@...> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> Has  lme4 1.0 been submitted to CRAN, or are is there some
> >> final tweaking going on?  Also, am I correct in
> >> assuming the lme4 ref.manual.pdf  will be updated to 1.0 when
> >>  1.0 becomes available?  Thanks.
> >>
> >
> >
> >  I note that I answered this question off-line but never on-line.
> >For those who are interested, I have posted updated release notes at:
> >
> >https://github.com/lme4/lme4/blob/master/misc/notes/release_notes.md
> >
> > The short answer is that we did submit lme4 1.0 to CRAN, but we are
> >still in negotiation with the CRAN maintainers about some
> >issues.  Stay tuned.
> >
> >  Ben Bolker
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

