Going over the paper quickly, it is just as much an indictment of SAS as it
is of R. So much for "validated statistical package".

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Alessandro Moscatelli
<moskante@gmail.com>wrote:

> The referee may have this article in mind:
>
>  Zhang H, Lu N, Feng C, Thurston SW, Xia Y, Zhu L, Tu XM. On fitting
> generalized linear mixed-effects models for binary responses using
> different
> statistical packages. Stat Med. 2011 Jun 10. doi: 10.1002/sim.4265. [Epub
> ahead
> of print] PubMed PMID: 21671252; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3175267.
>
> when he ask for a "validated statistical package (SAS, STATA, SPSS) as
> lme4 is known not to be the best". Hope this can help you with the
> answer!
>
> Alessandro Moscatelli
> Department of Cognitive Neuroscience
> Bielefeld Univerisy (DE)
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


