[R-sig-ME] Estimation of variance components in random- and mixed-effects models

Thierry Onkelinx th|erry@onke||nx @end|ng |rom |nbo@be
Mon Jun 28 19:17:54 CEST 2021


Another issue is that you have too few levels to fit "cohort" as a random
effect. I wrote a blogpost on this a few years ago:
https://www.muscardinus.be/2018/09/number-random-effect-levels/

Best regards,

ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Statisticus / Statistician

Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders
INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND
FOREST
Team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / Team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
thierry.onkelinx using inbo.be
Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussel
www.inbo.be

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

<https://www.inbo.be>


Op ma 28 jun. 2021 om 16:31 schreef Ben Bolker <bbolker using gmail.com>:

>    Are you using lme4? (I'm 99% sure you are, but it's good to be
> explicit.)
>
>    Are all of your fixed predictors numeric (rather than
> factor/categorical) ?
>
>    Note that a convergence warning is a *warning*, not an error: have
> you checked the troubleshooting steps in ?lme4::convergence (in
> particular, scaling and centering your predictor variables might help ...)
>
>    cheers
>     Ben Bolker
>
>
> On 6/28/21 10:17 AM, Amy Huang wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am examining maternal effects, and my data have three hierarchy levels:
> > clutches of the same female, females, and cohorts. My explanatory
> variables
> > are at the female level (female length, age) and at the cohort level
> > (temperature).
> >
> > I would like to estimate the variance components of each hierarchy level
> > (i.e. relative amount of variance at each level) and then to find out
> which
> > factors (female length, age, temperature) explain most of the variance.
> For
> > these, I have two models:
> >      offspring trait ~ 1 + (1 | cohort/female/clutch)
> >      offspring trait ~ temperature + female length + age + (1 |
> > cohort/female/clutch)
> >
> > The major problem is that I only have 3 cohorts (and so 3 temperatures).
> >  From the first model I am able to get the information, but from the
> second
> > one there is an error message: "Model failed to converge with 1 negative
> > eigenvalue: -2.0e+01". The error pops up probably because I have both
> > temperature (fixed) and cohort (random) included. Is my approach correct?
> > And is there a way to fix this error?
> >
> > Thank you so much for your time.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Amy Huang
> >
> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-mixed-models using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list