[R-sig-ME] effective sample size in MCMCglmm

Abraão de Barros Leite @b@rro@|b @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Mar 23 17:21:39 CET 2021


Thanks, I will make these changes and monitor how the models will converge.

All the best,
Abraão

Em ter, 23 de mar de 2021 12:42, Walid Crampton-Mawass <
walidmawass10 using gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> Indeed there is very high autocorrelation in your animal term. And your
> scale seems to be quite large given the estimates and HPDs. A good step
> would be to scale down your continuous variables to see if that helps with
> convergence in any way. Another possible practice is to drop one of the
> random terms in your model to see how that changes the behavior of your
> model. A side note, in your prior, there is no need to add n=0.002 to your
> residual term since you already fixed it to 1.
>
> Good luck
> --
> Walid Crampton-Mawass
> Ph.D. candidate in Evolutionary Biology
> Population Genetics Laboratory
> University of Québec at Trois-Rivières
> 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500
> Trois-Rivières (Québec) G9A 5H7
> Telephone: 819-376-5011 poste 3384
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:09 PM Abraão de Barros Leite <
> abarrosib using gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,  this is my script, and my dataset has 235 species.
>>
>> prior3.1 <- list(G = list(G1 = list(nu=0.002, V=1),G2 = list(nu=0.002,
>> V=1)),#fatores de variâncias a priori#
>>                  R = list( V=1,nu=0.002, fix=1))
>> m1<-MCMCglmm(progofic~1+Dieta+trafic+log(massakg)+endg,data=databird,
>> family="categorical",pedigree=contree,random=~animal+measureID,verbose = F,
>>          nitt=2500000,burnin=250000,thin=10000,prior =prior3.1)
>> summary(m1)
>> acf(m1$Sol[,1],lag.max =100)
>>
>> *Results:*
>>   Iterations = 250001:2490001
>>  Thinning interval  = 10000
>>  Sample size  = 225
>>
>>  DIC: 6.619977
>>
>>  G-structure:  ~animal
>>
>>        post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
>> animal      7713    999.2    15303    10.58
>>
>>                ~measureID
>>
>>           post.mean  l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
>> measureID     319.5 0.0005769     1505    81.04
>>
>>  R-structure:  ~units
>>
>>       post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
>> units         1        1        1        0
>>
>>  Location effects: progofic ~ 1 + Dieta + trafic + log(massakg) + endg
>>
>>                    post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp  pMCMC
>> (Intercept)          -32.757 -127.914   59.857  152.759 0.4889
>> DietaInvertebrate    -73.571 -153.500   -4.571    9.841 0.0356 *
>> DietaNectarivorous  -156.649 -527.852  191.174    4.441 0.6489
>> DietaOmnivore         -6.580  -43.869   33.693   83.293 0.7644
>> DietaVert            -13.890  -87.780   73.738   62.163 0.8000
>> traficyes             -1.761  -30.506   31.131  102.410 0.8711
>> log(massakg)          25.917    6.443   43.469   18.590 <0.004 **
>> endgEN                -3.139  -42.611   37.907   25.394 0.8889
>> endgVU               -35.510  -73.109    1.471   24.992 0.0444 *
>> ---
>> Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
>> > acf(m1$Sol[,1],lag.max =100)
>> > autocorr(m1$VCV)
>> ,* , animal*
>>                animal    measureID units
>> Lag 0      1.00000000 -0.022820572   NaN
>> Lag 10000  0.80567811 -0.045602281   NaN
>> Lag 50000  0.58800623  0.037466483   NaN
>> Lag 1e+05  0.37539889  0.221289380   NaN
>> Lag 5e+05 -0.08870539 -0.005622699   NaN
>> ,* , measureID*
>>                 animal    measureID units
>> Lag 0     -0.022820572  1.000000000   NaN
>> Lag 10000 -0.004848064  0.369835208   NaN
>> Lag 50000 -0.052249906  0.006497318   NaN
>> Lag 1e+05 -0.053667796 -0.001787120   NaN
>> Lag 5e+05 -0.015126358 -0.027780522   NaN
>> ,* , units*
>>           animal measureID units
>> Lag 0        NaN       NaN   NaN
>> Lag 10000    NaN       NaN   NaN
>> Lag 50000    NaN       NaN   NaN
>> Lag 1e+05    NaN       NaN   NaN
>> Lag 5e+05    NaN       NaN   NaN
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Abraão
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:32 PM Walid Crampton-Mawass <
>> walidmawass10 using gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes possibly, or the sample size is too small for the model structure
>>> you are attempting. It would help if you share your model structure and
>>> results of autocorr() to check if autocorrelation between chain iterations
>>> is high.
>>>
>>> Additionally, when replying in this thread, use the reply all option so
>>> our thread and discussion is included in the r-sig archives.
>>> --
>>> Walid Crampton-Mawass
>>> Ph.D. candidate in Evolutionary Biology
>>> Population Genetics Laboratory
>>> University of Québec at Trois-Rivières
>>> 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500
>>> Trois-Rivières (Québec) G9A 5H7
>>> Telephone: 819-376-5011 poste 3384
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:14 PM Abraão de Barros Leite <
>>> abarrosib using gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Walid, I used your thin, burnin, nitt values, the model arrived
>>>> sample size=1000, and there wasn't convergence still.
>>>> Do think if the problem is the priori values?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Abraão
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em seg, 22 de mar de 2021 14:30, Walid Crampton-Mawass <
>>>> walidmawass10 using gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> One way to improve the convergence of your phylogenetic model would be
>>>>> to increase the burn in iterations of the chain and take it into account in
>>>>> your total number of iterations. So in your case, I would set nitt=2500000,
>>>>> burnin= 500000 and nitt=2000, that way you would have a sample of 1000
>>>>> iterations saved from the total chain iterations (of course you can
>>>>> increase the thin interval based on the sample size of saved iterations you
>>>>> want).
>>>>>
>>>>> Good luck
>>>>> --
>>>>> Walid Crampton-Mawass
>>>>> Ph.D. candidate in Evolutionary Biology
>>>>> Population Genetics Laboratory
>>>>> University of Québec at Trois-Rivières
>>>>> 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500
>>>>> Trois-Rivières (Québec) G9A 5H7
>>>>> Telephone: 819-376-5011 poste 3384
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:24 AM Abraão de Barros Leite <
>>>>> abarrosib using gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Mathew
>>>>>>  My name is Abraão, I saw your answer aboute MCMCGLMM sample size.
>>>>>> So, please can you help me?
>>>>>> I am working with relation between brain mass and nest birds in my
>>>>>> doctorate.
>>>>>> My dataset has 250 species, but in my analysis MCMCGLMM with
>>>>>> phylogenetic
>>>>>> control, I haven't convergence, with nitt=2000000, thin=3500,
>>>>>> burnin=4000.
>>>>>> Please, can you help me?
>>>>>> How I can to improve my convergence?
>>>>>> Sample size=100 in the end it's ok?
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> R-sig-mixed-models using r-project.org mailing list
>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Abraão de Barros Leite
>> Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
>> Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais- São Carlos
>> (PPGERN)
>>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list