[R-sig-ME] Poor mixing and autocorrelation of ZIP data in MCMCglmm
Vital Heim
v|t@|@he|m @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Thu Jun 11 07:46:34 CEST 2020
Dear Ben and Pierre,
Thank you very much for the quick response - that is amazing and very
helpful!
I have not centered the continuous predictors as I had the feeling that
this would not be necessary in my model. Would you recommend to center them?
Thank you for the prior suggestion. From reading the course notes to
MCMCglmm I thought that I have to fix all the random effects variances to 1
in the ZI part. I am very new to Bayesian statistics and MCMCglmm and
therefore used the MCMCglmm course notes to write and understand my model.
There was one part in the course notes that said that there is no residual
variance for the zero-inflated process and that we cannot estimate the
residual covariance between the zero-inflation and the Poisson process but
that we can deal with this by fixing the residual variance for the ZI
portion at 1. Therefore I thought I have to do the same for my model.
I used the new prior and the model ran fine and showed some improvement.
The mixing of the random effects improved but the ZI portion of the random
effects did not mix well. Do you think the mixing could be/needs to be
further improved? Would you increase nu? I added you the model summary and
the autocorrelation diagnostics below:
> summary(model10)
Iterations = 150001:1849501
Thinning interval = 1500
Sample size = 1134
DIC: 4039.85
G-structure: ~idh(trait):id
post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
baitIntake.id 0.2097 0.01955 0.5446 1134.00
zi_baitIntake.id 140.2144 10.39550 412.5714 16.88
~idh(trait):dive
post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
baitIntake.event 0.2386 1.113e-01 0.3711 544.1
zi_baitIntake.event 1.6603 1.054e-07 5.7216 64.6
R-structure: ~idh(trait):units
post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp
baitIntake.units 0.5084 0.423 0.5999 1134
zi_baitIntake.units 1.0000 1.000 1.0000 0
Location effects: bait ~ trait - 1 + trait:sharks + trait:divers +
trait:boats + at.level(trait, 1):presence + at.level(trait, 1):temperature
+ trait:gender
post.mean l-95% CI u-95% CI eff.samp pMCMC
baitIntake -0.989171 -8.506002 7.022529 1036.3 0.80071
zi_baitIntake 5.726646 -0.731875 14.671429 118.8 0.09171
.
baitIntake:conspecifics -0.049999 -0.115503 0.015834 1134.0 0.13757
zi_baitIntake:conspecifics 0.185816 -0.129883 0.601750 437.8 0.31922
baitIntake:tourists 0.044321 0.010587 0.075382 1134.0 0.00529
**
zi_baitIntake:tourists -0.154735 -0.341183 0.021306 258.0 0.05996
.
baitIntake:operators 0.157988 0.069429 0.255920 1134.0 0.00176
**
zi_baitIntake:operators -0.232157 -0.776007 0.249766 472.4 0.35979
presence 0.010091 0.008344 0.011620 1134.0 < 9e-04
***
temperature 0.260196 -0.062494 0.536471 1027.0 0.08466
.
baitIntake:gendermale 0.355938 -0.329717 1.143065 1134.0 0.28571
zi_baitIntake:gendermale -1.787142 -16.777974 10.576166 200.1 0.80952
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
> autocorr.diag(model10$Sol)
baitIntake zi_baitIntake baitIntake:conspec zi_baitIntake:consp.
baitIntake:tourists zi_baitIntake:tourists
Lag 0 1.00000000 1.00000000 1.000000000 1.000000000
1.00000000 1.0000000000
Lag 1500 0.04457168 0.32629918 0.011215824 0.400247111
-0.02362611 0.4065199561
Lag 7500 -0.01118381 0.21355704 -0.056422233 0.050903050
-0.06575857 0.1543329508
Lag 15000 -0.01182550 0.14366161 -0.004787545 0.048794655
0.01045932 0.1180500281
Lag 75000 -0.06205008 0.05428778 -0.012689660 0.004470857
-0.01587028 -0.0001966966
baitIntake:operators zi_baitIntake:operators presence
temperature baitIntake:gendermale zi_baitIntake:gendermale
Lag 0 1.000000000 1.00000000 1.000000000
1.000000000 1.000000000 1.00000000
Lag 1500 0.018702637 0.34990109 -0.005337675
0.049056906 -0.008540371 0.11797192
Lag 7500 0.029576245 0.04236116 0.051737798
-0.004486268 -0.043298182 0.10059317
Lag 15000 -0.006467939 0.07262102 0.020471250
-0.011604859 0.010096511 0.04657296
Lag 75000 0.050869606 -0.01289837 0.034904725
-0.064627241 -0.019433089 0.04871585
> autocorr.diag(model10$VCV)
baitIntake.id zi_baitIntake.id baitIntake.event
zi_baitIntake.event baitIntake.units zi_baitIntake.units
Lag 0 1.00000000 1.0000000 1.00000000
1.000000000 1.00000000 NaN
Lag 1500 -0.01347780 0.6908849 0.03201474
0.789290686 0.02634913 NaN
Lag 7500 -0.04617914 0.5013689 -0.03223097
0.519696189 -0.02148069 NaN
Lag 15000 0.01414618 0.5099142 -0.04454962
0.341925156 -0.04412612 NaN
Lag 75000 -0.03180043 0.2266740 -0.01645174
-0.003025432 -0.01177512 NaN
And then I would have another question regarding the prior which I am not
sure if that is ok to post here. If not feel free to let me know. I have
been looking up papers to learn how to properly report my prior choice and
details in a publication. I found some papers that just wrote "we chose a
inverse gamma prior" but I am concerned that some reviewers would want more
specific information. Do you have a recommendation on how to correctly
report a prior in a publication?
Best wishes,
Vital
--
*Vital Heim *
*PhD student*
University of Basel, Switzerland
Bimini Biological Field Station Foundation
Bimini, Bahamas
+41 (0)79 732 05 57
vital.heim using gmail.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list