[R-sig-ME] zero-inflated-count-data?

Thierry Onkelinx thierry.onkelinx at inbo.be
Mon Feb 26 09:16:55 CET 2018


Another option is the fit the model using a distribution without
zero-inflation. Then simulate data from that model and count the number of
zero's. Repeat this several times so that you get a distribution of the
number of zero's. In case of zero-inflation the number of zero's in the
data is much higher that those from the simulated data.

Best regards,


ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Statisticus / Statistician

Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders
INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND
FOREST
Team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / Team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
thierry.onkelinx at inbo.be
Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussel
www.inbo.be

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

<https://www.inbo.be>

2018-02-25 23:55 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Judge <bachlaw01 at outlook.com>:

> The pscl package offers the (somewhat controversial) Vuong test for this
> purpose and is a good ZI/hurdle resource in general.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > On Feb 25, 2018, at 3:45 PM, C. AMAL D. GLELE <altessedac2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Ben
> > Many thanks to you for your very helpful reply.
> > Best and regards,
> >
> > 2018-02-25 19:05 GMT+01:00 Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> There is no set proportion.  (For example, a Poisson distribution with
> >> a mean of 0.01 is expected to be about 99% zeros, even without
> >> zero-inflation.) There's a little bit of (bare-bones) discussion of
> >> how to test for zero-inflation here:
> >> https://bbolker.github.io/mixedmodels-misc/glmmFAQ.html#zero-inflation
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:08 AM, C. AMAL D. GLELE <
> altessedac2 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi, dear all.
> >>> From which proportion of zero a count should be considered as
> >> zero-inflated
> >>> (in order to use a zero-inflated model for it's modelling)?
> >>> In advance, thanks for your replies.
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> >> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> >>> Garanti
> >>> sans virus. www.avast.com
> >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> >> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >>>
> >>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> >
> >    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list