[R-sig-ME] Struggle with glmer().
r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
Sun Jul 16 23:09:33 CEST 2017
On 17/07/17 00:14, Anthony R. Ives wrote:
> To make sure somebody speaks to you … but probably no big India
> rubber ball .
> I tried your code with the "nAGQ=0" option, and it fit quickly. The
> "non-converged" fit under the default was very similar for the point
> estimates of the fixed effects. Ben should confirm this, but in my
> experience the nAGQ=0 option is normally pretty good, and it also
> handles pathological cases when the random effects estimates
Wow. That does indeed seem to me to be a big red India rubber ball!!!
Rapid fit, and the ominous warnings go away.
I tried it with the real data --- likewise rapid fit and no warnings.
Haven't done any thorough checking of results yet, but it sure looks
like progress to me.
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models