[R-sig-ME] Plotting best fit lines binomial GLMM
Alex Fine
abfine at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 03:02:17 CET 2016
I always liked this way of visualizing mixed logit models:
https://hlplab.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/plotting-effects-for-glmer-familybimomial-models/
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:35 PM, M West <m.westinbrook at gmail.com> wrote:
> aha, you are right - sorry, I received a weird error message earlier saying
> it wasn't available for glmer....that doesn't appear now. thanks.
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Fox, John <jfox at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>
> > Dear M.,
> >
> > The effects package does work with GLMMs fit with glmer() in the lme4
> > package. See ?Effect. Here's an example adapted from ?glmer:
> >
> > library(effects)
> > library(lme4)
> > library("HSAUR2")
> > gm2 <- glmer(outcome~treatment*visit+(1|patientID),
> > data=toenail, family=binomial, nAGQ=20)
> > Effect(c("treatment", "visit"), gm2)
> >
> > producing
> >
> > treatment*visit effect
> > visit
> > treatment 1 2 3 4 5
> > 6 7
> > itraconazole 0.2236820 0.1155113 0.05588527 0.02612852 0.012014461
> > 0.005481597 0.0024920184
> > terbinafine 0.2104865 0.0871212 0.03303451 0.01208159 0.004358651
> > 0.001564643 0.0005606578
> >
> > I hope this helps,
> > John
> >
> > -----------------------------
> > John Fox, Professor
> > McMaster University
> > Hamilton, Ontario
> > Canada L8S 4M4
> > Web: socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: R-sig-mixed-models [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-
> > > project.org] On Behalf Of M West
> > > Sent: January 31, 2016 11:29 PM
> > > To: Phillip Alday <Phillip.Alday at unisa.edu.au>
> > > Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Plotting best fit lines binomial GLMM
> > >
> > > Thanks for this suggestions Philip - it looks like the effects package
> > doesn't
> > > work for GLMMs - it works with glms.....
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Phillip Alday <
> > Phillip.Alday at unisa.edu.au>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Addressing the plotting issue: look at the effects package. You can
> > > > directly plot effects objects (which will yield lattice plots) or you
> > > > can convert them to data frames and plot by hand (e.g. if you want
> > > > more control and/or ggplot).
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Phillip
> > > >
> > > > On 30/01/16 08:18, M West wrote:
> > > > > Main questions:
> > > > > (1) How to extract coefficients from GLMM to plot best fit lines to
> > data?
> > > > > (2) Are there other options for dealing with these sorts of data
> > > > > besides mixed effects models (or RM ANOVA)?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Specifics: I have a short time series data across 12 sites over 8
> > years.
> > > > > I'd like an omnibus plot that summarizes the main pattern interest
> > > > > in
> > > > these
> > > > > data.
> > > > >
> > > > > The dependent variable is frequency females (data are # smokers out
> > > > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > total population). The independent variable is also a frequency (#
> > > > infected
> > > > > out of the total population).
> > > > >
> > > > > Plotting each year separately it's easy to see the positive
> > > > > correlation between smokers and infection. However, given the
> > > > > variation among years, plotting all the data on a single plot
> > > > > obscures the overall pattern....I need to fit regression lines to
> > > > > each year.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know how to do this with lme....but I can't quite find how to do
> > > > > this with GLMM and I've analyzed the data with a GLMM with a
> > > > > binomial distribution (following Crawley) [While the data are
> > > > > binomial, they are not binary (i.e., not 0 and 1)so a logistic
> curve
> > > > > doesn't work].
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I found this thread on inspecting the residuals but I haven't been
> > > > > able
> > > > to
> > > > > find anything on plotting a best fit line for these type of data.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/70783/how-to-assess-the-fit-o
> > > > f-a-binomial-glmm-fitted-with-lme4-1-0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I would *much prefer* to use something other than mixed effects
> > > > > models (I think the results are not straightforward to interpret
> and
> > > > > every book or blog recommends a different approach) for this
> > > > > analysis so if there are other suggestions they are also welcome!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > M.
> > > > >
> > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> > > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
--
Alex Fine
Ph. (336) 302-3251
web: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~abfine/
<http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~abfine/AlexFineHome.html>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list