[R-sig-ME] Extremely High Slope/Intercept Correlation
Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT)
wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl
Mon Dec 2 10:35:58 CET 2013
I assume 'Male' is dichotomous, so it has just two levels. Not likely that one can estimate any variance components based on that grouping variable with any degree of precision.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-
> bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of ONKELINX, Thierry
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 10:20
> To: AvianResearchDivision; r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Extremely High Slope/Intercept Correlation
>
> This can be caused by having more complexity than the data allows. Note
> that the variance of the random slope is small.
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-
> bounces at r-project.org] Namens AvianResearchDivision
> Verzonden: maandag 2 december 2013 2:05
> Aan: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> Onderwerp: [R-sig-ME] Extremely High Slope/Intercept Correlation
>
> Hi all,
>
> I came across extremely high slope/intercept correlation (-1.00) when
> running the following model:
>
> model<-lmer(X~Y+(Y|Male))
>
> summary(model)
>
> Random effects:
>
> Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
> Corr
>
>
> Male (Intercept) 1.562e-01 0.3952284
>
> Y 7.581e-07 0.0008707
> -1.00
>
> Residual 2.661e-01 0.5158953
>
> Number of obs: 879, groups: Male, 59
>
>
> What is causing this? This high of a correlation does not seem possible,
> especially in ecology. Any suggestions moving forward?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jacob
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * D I S C L A I M E R * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver
> weer en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet
> bevestigd is door een geldig ondertekend document.
> The views expressed in this message and any annex are purely those of the
> writer and may not be regarded as stating an official position of INBO, as
> long as the message is not confirmed by a duly signed document.
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list