[R-sig-ME] Overdispersion and model selection: glmmadmb vs. glmer
David Duffy
David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au
Mon Aug 26 00:50:04 CEST 2013
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Luca Corlatti wrote:
> My data are counts showing overdispersion. I therefore fitted my models
> using the function glmmadmb with family=nbinom
> [AND] using the function
> glmer, with family=poisson, adding the observation-level as a random
> factor (1|obs) to account for overdispersion, as recently suggested. In
> this case, however, visual inspection of residuals for the global model
> were not very satisfactory. After running the model selection, the
> results were quite different from those obtained with glmmadmb (not
> dramatically different, but still...).
One is assuming chi-square and gaussian distribution of the REs
respectively. One can also fit "nonparametric" mixed models with
mixtures (eg of gaussians) for the RE distribution. Often there is not
a lot of power to test different distributions of the latent variables.
Cheers, Davidl Duffy.
| David Duffy (MBBS PhD) ,-_|\
| email: davidD at qimr.edu.au ph: INT+61+7+3362-0217 fax: -0101 / *
| Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research \_,-._/
| 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia GPG 4D0B994A v
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list