[R-sig-ME] unreplicated repeated measures
Jinsong Zhao
jszhao at yeah.net
Wed Nov 23 16:36:26 CET 2011
An artificial data:
Trt Time Yield
1 1983 -1.3249564
1 1986 0.7196249
1 1993 0.1483918
1 1998 0.1739599
1 2003 -0.5962691
1 2010 -0.1382644
2 1983 -0.5212350
2 1986 -0.5751201
2 1993 -0.7656928
2 1998 1.0399397
2 2003 1.5328539
2 2010 -0.5204021
3 1983 0.9821412
3 1986 -0.4376944
3 1993 -1.2453136
3 1998 -0.3852303
3 2003 -1.9200383
3 2010 0.2154259
Thanks again for your attention.
Regards,
Jinsong
On 2011-11-23 23:33, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
> It's a old post found by searching.
>
> On 2009-6-24 1:29, Christine Griffiths wrote:
>> Dear R users,
>>
>> Sorry if this question is not applicable to this site. I am having
>> problems
>> analysing unreplicated repeated measures. I calculated food web
>> properties
>> for three treatments over time (10 months). It is unreplicated in that I
>> only have one observation per month per treatment. My problem is that
>> I am
>> interested in how a food web property varies between Treatments and over
>> time.
>>
>
> I have a similar data set, and hope to do similar statistical analysis.
>
>> Originally I had tried using lmer:
>> m4<-lmer(lncon~Treatment*month+(1|month),data=dataset)
>> but this provides the following error for which I have not found an
>> explanation to on the R site.
>> Error in mer_finalize(ans) : Calculated PWRSS for a LMM is negative
>
> gls() in nlme package was recommended to deal with my situation.
> However, I don't know how to describe the fixed effects:
>
> gls(lncon~Treatment*month, data = dataset)
>
> or
>
> gls(lncon~Treatment+month, data = dataset)
>
> It seems that the above two formula can run correctly, however, I don't
> know which one should be preferred, and whether the variable month
> should be treated as a factor or a continuous variable. I have read the
> book of Pinheiro & Bates, and found the time variable in dataset, e.g.,
> Orthodont, is a numeric vector. What's the difference?
>
> Is it possible to intercept the data by lme() or lmer(), for there is no
> group variable?
>
> <snip>
>
> Any suggestions or comments will be really appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Jinsong
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list