[R-sig-ME] tree diameter growth

Drew Tyre atyre2 at unl.edu
Tue Aug 23 16:14:20 CEST 2011


I would agree with Andrew's comments. In addition, there might be
phylogenetic effects - correlations between species due to the
relatedness, e.g. species in the same genus are more similar than
species in different genera. Package MCMCglmm can handle phylogenetic
correlations, although I've never had the opportunity to try it
myself.

What a wonderful dataset!

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Bin Yue <byicymoon at 163.com> wrote:
> Dear experts in mixed-models,
>   I am a postdoc dealing with the growth data of a 20 ha forest plot. I want to know whether  the diameter growth of individuals is relatedto the size distribution types( reversed j shaped and unimiodal) of the speciesthe individuals belong to. Although I have obtained result, I am still hesitating. Because I feel that something is worong with the output.
>
> I used this command:
> lmer(log(dbh.y)-log(dbh.x)~scale(log(dbh.x))+(1|spcode/classsizedist),data=livestem)->gr,
>  where the left side is the response variable : the logarithm of dbh in 2010 minus the logarithm of dbh in 2005 ( the relative diameter growth rate),
>  the first component on the right side is the logarithm of dbh in 2005 after standardization ( each element minus the mean and devided by the sd),
>  the second part is what makes me hesitate.
>  Actually livestem is a data.frame, each line representing each individual. All dbh.y, dbh.x, spcode and classsizedist are its columns. I have 83 spcodes. classsizedist is the type of size distribution.The same species must have the same type of size distribution.
>  I think that I can use the lmer function in lme4 package to tested whether diameter growth is associated with the size distribution. I don't actually care how diameter growth is related to original diamter, and species identity but taking these variables into account helps reduce the residual sum of square used in the F test for the effect of size distribution on diameter growth. So on the right side of ~, I have three variables: the original diameter, the species, and the size distribution type of the species. There is obvious hierachical structure among these variables,where individuals are nested within species and species are nested within the type of size distribution.
>
> What stop me from putting down the results into the manuscript are that I am not quite sure whether the command I use is doing what I want and I cannot interpret the results.
>
>  I have read some materials and I am confounded by the random effect and the fixed effect. Originally I think random and fixed effect can be set by mysels as I wish. After some reading it seems to me that random effect is something similar to the effect of error but with a different variance and fixed effect is like the mean.
>
> The following is the result of gr
>
> lmer(log(dbh.y)-log(dbh.x)~scale(log(dbh.x))+(1|spcode/classsizedist),data=livestem)->gr
>> summary(gr)
> Linear mixed model fit by REML
> Formula: log(dbh.y) - log(dbh.x) ~ scale(log(dbh.x)) + (1 | spcode/classsizedist)
>    AIC    BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
>  -29390 -29345  14700   -29419  -29400
> Random effects:
>  Groups               Name        Variance  Std.Dev.
>  classsizedist:spcode (Intercept) 0.0015012 0.038745
>  spcode               (Intercept) 0.0162077 0.127310
>  Residual                         0.0381650 0.195359
> Number of obs: 69669, groups:classsizedist:spcode, 83; spcode, 83
> Fixed effects:
>                   Estimate Std. Error t value
> (Intercept)        0.123306   0.014759    8.35
> scale(log(dbh.x)) -0.084744   0.001102  -76.93
> Correlation of Fixed Effects:
>            (Intr)
> scl(lg(d.)) -0.003
>
>
> pvals.fnc(gr)
> $fixed
>                  Estimate MCMCmean HPD95lower HPD95upper  pMCMC Pr(>|t|)
> (Intercept)         0.1233   0.1234     0.0990     0.1478 0.0001        0
> scale(log(dbh.x))  -0.0847  -0.0847    -0.0868    -0.0825 0.0001        0
> $random
>                Groups        Name Std.Dev. MCMCmedian MCMCmean HPD95lower
> 1 classsizedist:spcode (Intercept)   0.0387     0.0448   0.0453     0.0000
> 2               spcode (Intercept)   0.1273     0.0998   0.0974     0.0633
> 3             Residual               0.1954     0.1954   0.1954     0.1944
>  HPD95upper
> 1     0.0873
> 2     0.1222
> 3     0.1964
>
>
>
> I think something is wrong with the command because in the output: groups: classsizedist:spcode, 83; spcode, 83
> I have 83 species but 2 classsizedist.
> I would look forward to your reply.
> Thank you very much for your time.
>  Sincerely,
> Bin Yue
>
>
> --
>
>
> Bin Yue
>
> Ph.D
>
> College of Life Science,Sun Yat-sen University
>
> Guangdong Province, China
>
> Email:byicymoon at 163.com
>
>
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>



-- 
Drew Tyre

School of Natural Resources
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
416 Hardin Hall, East Campus
3310 Holdrege Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0974

phone: +1 402 472 4054
fax: +1 402 472 2946
email: atyre2 at unl.edu
http://snr.unl.edu/tyre
http://aminpractice.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/atiretoo




More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list