[R-sig-ME] confidence intervals in lmer
Rachel Cohen
s0957429 at sms.ed.ac.uk
Sat Jan 22 20:57:25 CET 2011
Hi, I am trying to get the 95% confidence intervals for the coefficients
in the lmer model below.
mod5<-lmer((centre.log.mass)~centre.log.dbh+centre.log.height+(1+centre.log.height|species_site),data=data3,REML=F)
I have tried to use the function ci(mod5) but get the following error
message:
Error in .local(object, n, verbose, ...) :
Code for non-trivial theta_T not yet written
However, the function works when I alter my model as below:
mod6<-lmer((centre.log.mass)~centre.log.dbh+centre.log.height+(1|species_site)+(0+centre.log.height|species_site),data=data3,REML=F)
I'm not sure this what this altered model means, (i.e. why are random
effects terms different, i'm still allowing both the intercept and the
slope of height to vary by group?) but the model output is different
from my original model. The coefficients are different and I seem to
now have eliminated any correlation between the slope and intercept.
Which I'm thinking was the reason why the ci function wouldn't work in
the first place?
Mod 6 output
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
species_site (Intercept) 2.32117 1.52354
species_site centre.log.height 0.47887 0.69200
Residual 0.10036 0.31679
Number of obs: 302, groups: species_site, 12
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) -0.47716 0.44829 -1.064
centre.log.dbh 1.68772 0.07536 22.396
centre.log.height 0.67887 0.24345 2.789
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) cntr.lg.d
cntr.lg.dbh 0.026
cntr.lg.hgh 0.028 -0.302
Any help in understanding whats going on would be great!
Regards,
Rachel
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list