[R-sig-ME] Modelling heterogeneity and crossed random effects
Amelie Lescroel
amelie.lescroel at univ-rennes1.fr
Wed Aug 18 10:05:38 CEST 2010
Dear all,
I did not receive any answer to my questions below. Not that I consider that
anybody "owes" me an answer but I would really need advices from people more
knowledgeable than I am. Please let me know if I need to reformulate /
shorten my questions or examples or if they are too "naïve".
Best regards,
Amelie
-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org
[mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Amelie
Lescroel
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:16 PM
To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-ME] Modelling heterogeneity and crossed random effects
Dear all,
I am currently trying to model the behavioural response of individual
seabirds (in terms of foraging efficiency) to the variation in sea ice cover
(SICdr) of their foraging environment. I have 13 years of data, birds are
individually marked and followed, I have several records (= foraging
efficiency data = CPUEr in my code) per individual (IDr) for each year
(YEARr) and individuals are followed across years.
I am trying to find the right random effect structure (biologically
meaningful and dealing with problems of independence) and to deal with
heterogeneity of the residual variance at the same time (for all my models,
the variance of the residuals increases with increasing fitted values).
Regarding the random effect structure, would you say that crossed random
effects of the form (1|IDr) + (1|YEARr) would correctly reflect the study
design? Is there any way to model the variance heterogeneity in lmer that
would be analogous to the varIdent or varFixed functions in nlme? So far, I
can model the variance heterogeneity with nlme only and the (hopefully)
appropriate random effect structure with lmer only. Would you have other
suggestions for dealing with this heteroscedasticity?
Here are a couple of examples regarding the random effect structure with
some associated questions:
> M1 <- lmer(CPUEr~SEXr+SICdr+(1|IDr))
> summary(M1)
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: CPUEr ~ SEXr + SICdr + (1 | IDr)
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
270.2 297.6 -130.1 234.5 260.2
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
IDr (Intercept) 0.010906 0.10443
Residual 0.060610 0.24619
Number of obs: 1759, groups: IDr, 229
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 0.3070164 0.0155734 19.714
SEXrM 0.0961795 0.0195420 4.922
SICdr 0.0026240 0.0008478 3.095
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) SEXrM
SEXrM -0.612
SICdr -0.478 -0.006
Here, the correlation between 2 observations from the same individual
(irrespective of year) is: 0.010906/(0.010906+0.060610)=0.15
> M2 <- lmer(CPUEr~SEXr+SICdr+(1|YEARr))
> summary(M2)
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: CPUEr ~ SEXr + SICdr + (1 | YEARr)
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
117.1 144.5 -53.55 84.8 107.1
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
YEARr (Intercept) 0.020395 0.14281
Residual 0.059892 0.24473
Number of obs: 1759, groups: YEARr, 13
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 0.36443 0.04367 8.345
SEXrM 0.10819 0.01175 9.207
SICdr -0.00920 0.00192 -4.793
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) SEXrM
SEXrM -0.134
SICdr -0.367 0.009
Here, the correlation between 2 observations from the same year
(irrespective of the bird) is: 0.020395/(0.020395+0.059892)=0.25 How do I
get the correlation of 2 observations from the same individual within a
year? By modeling CPUEr~SEXr+SICdr+(1|YEARr/IDr)?
> M3 <- lmer(CPUEr~SEXr+SICdr+(1|YEARr/IDr))
> summary(M3)
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: CPUEr ~ SEXr + SICdr + (1 | YEARr/IDr)
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
51.29 84.12 -19.64 17.21 39.29
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
IDr:YEARr (Intercept) 0.0097178 0.09858
YEARr (Intercept) 0.0188065 0.13714
Residual 0.0500727 0.22377
Number of obs: 1759, groups: IDr:YEARr, 543; YEARr, 13
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 0.357318 0.042408 8.426
SEXrM 0.104650 0.014207 7.366
SICdr -0.008960 0.001855 -4.831
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) SEXrM
SEXrM -0.166
SICdr -0.365 0.004
Then, would the correlation of 2 observations from the same individual
within a year be 0.0097178/(0.0097178+0.0500727)=0.16?
My best model (in terms of AIC) so far is the following:
> M4 <- lmer(CPUEr~SEXr+SICdr+(SICdr|IDr)+(1|YEARr))
> summary(M4)
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: CPUEr ~ SEXr + SICdr + (SICdr | IDr) + (1 | YEARr)
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
12.88 56.66 1.559 -24.55 -3.119
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Corr
IDr (Intercept) 8.9314e-03 0.0945058
SICdr 2.3781e-05 0.0048766 -0.464
YEARr (Intercept) 2.1401e-02 0.1462922
Residual 5.0765e-02 0.2253112
Number of obs: 1759, groups: IDr, 229; YEARr, 13
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 0.363366 0.045471 7.991
SEXrM 0.100215 0.017188 5.830
SICdr -0.009910 0.001974 -5.021
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) SEXrM
SEXrM -0.189
SICdr -0.357 0.010
How should I interpret the random effects?
I am using the R package version 0.999375-31 of lme4 and R version 2.9.2.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Cheers,
Amelie
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list