[R-sig-ME] factor / intiger
Sam
Sam_Smith at me.com
Tue Aug 3 15:43:52 CEST 2010
Dear Dan,
Thanks for this,
I was not working back from the AIC i was just unsure why they are different - in what way are they a different model?
If i have categorical predictors i should code them as factors in GLMM - correct?
Thanks
Sam
On 3 Aug 2010, at 14:40, Daniel Ezra Johnson wrote:
Dear Sam,
When the factor levels are numbers, you have to do:
> A <- as.factor(as.character(A))
Regarding your other question, it's an entirely different model, if
you treat the predictors as linear/numeric or as factors. You should
choose based on what the predictor(s) is/are, probably not working
backwards from the AIC.
Dan
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Sam <Sam_Smith at me.com> wrote:
> Dear List
>
> I have a excel spread sheet with 5 columns that contain categorical data. I have recoded them to numbers
>
> A B C
> 0 0 0
> 1 1 1
> 2 2 2
> 3 3
> 4
> 5
>
> etc
>
> When i read it into R and do str(dataframe) i get -
>
> $ A : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> $ B : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> $ C : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> $ D : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> $ E : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
>
> I then realised they should probably be factors instead of integers so used as.factor to convert them -
>
> A <- as.factor(A)
>
> Now when i run the GLMM the AIC values are different from when they were integers, i have 2 questions
>
> 1. Should i not have converted the categories to numbers in the excel spreadsheet before import.
>
> 2. Why are the AIC values different when i use as.factor as opposed to keeping them as integers, and which approach is recommended?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sam
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list