[R-sig-ME] lme4a, glmer and all that

Mitchell Maltenfort mmalten at gmail.com
Thu Jun 24 15:38:24 CEST 2010

Haven't seen anything new since his March 4 post indicating that a
check vs Stata agreed with lme4, not lme4a.

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jeffrey Evans
<Jeffrey.Evans at dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> Can anyone provide a status update on Doug Bates' comment from March about
> doubting parameter estimates from glmer in lme4?
> A) Which version is suspect - version 32, it seems?
> B) Des version 33 resolve this issue?
> Many thanks,
> Jeff Evans
> Dartmouth College
> In March Doug Bates wrote:
> "Two further comments. It is only the results from fitting generalized
> linear mixed models with the current lme4 that I have cause to doubt. The
> results from linear mixed models do check out. "
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models

More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list