[R-sig-ME] Why post-hoc Tukey more significant than lme P-values?

Chris Kleier chris.kleier at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 14:43:55 CEST 2010

Previous message: [R-sig-ME] Predictive growth curve for a ZIP model in MCMCglmm
Next message: [R-sig-ME] Why post-hoc Tukey more significant than lme P-values?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20100611/6e066709/attachment.pl>

Previous message: [R-sig-ME] Predictive growth curve for a ZIP model in MCMCglmm
Next message: [R-sig-ME] Why post-hoc Tukey more significant than lme P-values?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list