[R-sig-ME] Effect Size in lme
Patrick Onyango
pogola at Princeton.EDU
Mon Mar 8 23:51:49 CET 2010
Dear Ben,
Many thanks.
Thanks for clarifying: yes, I am interested in effect size with
respect to biological significance of my findings. In addition to
the suggestions you have provided, which I hope to talk to you some,
would you recommend using the following formula, from Nakagawa &
Cuthill (2007) Biol. Rev. 82, 591-605: partial correlation
coefficient, r = the t value divided by the square of the sum of the
t value squared and its corresponding degrees of freedom?
Here is the equation:
I am not quite sure how to interpret, with respect to the kind of
effect I am looking for, the parameter estimates and the other values
that you suggested. Are there resources you can recommend. In the
meantime, I will check in P & B 2000 as well as in West et al. 2007.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> Patrick Onyango wrote:
>> All,
>> I have been asked to provide effect sizes for results I obtained from
>> lme. Does anyone know how to handle this?
>>
>> Many thanks already.
>> Patrick
>
> There are a lot of definitions of "effect size". If the request is
> simply to indicate the practical relevance of the effects (i.e.
> 'biological' significance), I would just quote the parameter estimates
> (with standard errors), and the standard deviations of the random
> effects ...
>
> --
> Ben Bolker
> Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida
> bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker
> GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list