[R-sig-ME] Unable to fit glmer withfamily=binomial(link=identity)
Doran, Harold
HDoran at air.org
Wed Aug 19 18:09:23 CEST 2009
Should have added this to offer an example. What you want is possible, but I don't think this is what you really want. But, I've been wrong before.
> (gm1 <- glmer(cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd), family = gaussian, data = cbpp))
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd)
Data: cbpp
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
255.1 267.3 -121.5 246.3 243.1
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
herd (Intercept) 0.0000 0.0000
Residual 5.1254 2.2639
Number of obs: 56, groups: herd, 15
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 4.0667 0.5845 6.957
period2 -2.8524 0.8413 -3.390
period3 -3.0667 0.8413 -3.645
period4 -3.5282 0.8579 -4.113
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) perid2 perid3
period2 -0.695
period3 -0.695 0.483
period4 -0.681 0.473 0.473
> (gm2 <- lmer(cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd), data = cbpp))
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd)
Data: cbpp
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
255.1 267.3 -121.5 246.3 243.1
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
herd (Intercept) 0.0000 0.0000
Residual 5.1254 2.2639
Number of obs: 56, groups: herd, 15
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 4.0667 0.5845 6.957
period2 -2.8524 0.8413 -3.390
period3 -3.0667 0.8413 -3.645
period4 -3.5282 0.8579 -4.113
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) perid2 perid3
period2 -0.695
period3 -0.695 0.483
period4 -0.681 0.473 0.473
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org
> [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf
> Of Doran, Harold
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:59 AM
> To: David Evans; r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Unable to fit glmer
> withfamily=binomial(link=identity)
>
> I may be missing something here, but why are you using an
> identity link with binomial outcomes? If there is a reason
> why, you might as well just use lmer since the identity link
> is for a normal distribution and that is the distributional
> assumption used for the errors in that function.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org
> > [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf
> Of David
> > Evans
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:03 AM
> > To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> > Subject: [R-sig-ME] Unable to fit glmer with
> > family=binomial(link=identity)
> >
> > Fellow R-users,
> >
> > I need to estimate the "risk difference" (in epidemiological
> > terminology) for a neighbourhood-level exposure (e.g.
> > presence of parks) with a binary outcome adjusted on 5 or so
> > covariables. Study participants are clusted by
> neighbourhood . I was
> > hoping to use a generalized linear mixed model with the code:
> >
> > mod <- glmer(outcome ~ exposure + (1 | neighbourhood),
> > family=binomial(link=identity), data=rec)
> >
> > but the identity link is not available for the binomial family with
> > glmer (or for glmmPQL). Is there any way to do this with
> lme4 or is
> > there another package in R which could fix my problem?
> >
> > I'd be very grateful for any help.
> >
> > David.
> >
> > --
> > David Evans
> > UMR-S 707 Inserm - Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris
> 6 Faculté
> > de Médecine Saint-Antoine 27, rue Chaligny
> > 75571 Paris cedex 12
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list