[R-sig-ME] Need some advice on my model specification
Kingsford Jones
kingsfordjones at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 00:58:31 CEST 2009
One more tip...
I avoided the degrees of freedom question in my response, but perhaps
the following link will help:
http://tinyurl.com/kmlsf7
hth,
Kingsford
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Djibril
Dayamba<Djibril.Dayamba at ess.slu.se> wrote:
> Hello,
> I previously wrote to R-help, I got some advices and was kindly redirected by Kingsford to this specific Help-list (mixed models) for further questions. Since then I have moved a bit but I still have some points where I would appreciate having clarification.
>
> I have a factorial experiment ( with 4 repetitions for each treatment combination) to study the effects of Grazing and Fire on Forest biomass production. The experimental unit (to which the treatment combinations are applied) are PLOTs. The measures were made repeatedly for 13 years. Below is how I organized my data; Plot is the plot naming in the field; BA.B is the response variable (Basal area) I am using to express myself here
>
>
> Grazing Fire Plot Year BA.B
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 1 398.13
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 2 4728.54
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 3 2092.05
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 4 3076.70
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 5 2578.54
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 6 2541.07
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 7 3191.61
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 8 2526.75
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 9 3665.42
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 10 3077.42
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 11 3911.63
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 12 4067.28
> Ungrazed Unburnt 102 13 4457.94
> Ungrazed Unburnt 108 1 370.99
> Ungrazed Unburnt 108 2 2184.39
> Ungrazed Unburnt 108 3 2008.66
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
>
> I fitted the below model to account for the temporal autocorrelation and the variance heterogeneity. I also have a missing value.
>
> Model<-lme(BA.B~Grazing*Fire*Year, random=~1|Year/Plot/Fire/Grazing, correlation=corAR1(form=~Year), weights=varIdent(form=~1|Grazing*Fire*Year), na.action=na.omit)
>
> For the random effect I got something like this
>
> Random effects:
> Formula: ~1 | Year
> (Intercept)
> StdDev: 234.6285
>
> Formula: ~1 | Plot %in% Year
> (Intercept)
> StdDev: 67.01272
>
> Formula: ~1 | Fire %in% Plot %in% Year
> (Intercept)
> StdDev: 66.80442
>
> Formula: ~1 | Grazing %in% Fire %in% Plot %in% Year
> (Intercept) Residual
> StdDev: 66.83408 153.0221
>
>
> For the correlation structure, the Phi value is 0 (zero)
>
> Correlation Structure: AR(1)
> Formula: ~Year | Year/Plot/Fire/Grazing
> Parameter estimate(s):
> Phi
> 0
>
> For the fixed effects, please note the identical degree of freedom for every term (except Year)
>
> Fixed effects: BA.B ~ Grazing * Fire * Year
> Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
> (Intercept) 461.4655 178.15612 396 2.590231 0.0099
> GrazingUngrazed -180.1041 104.88596 396 -1.717143 0.0867
> FireUnburnt -236.3691 124.54654 396 -1.897837 0.0584
> Year 410.9426 31.68234 11 12.970718 0.0000
> GrazingUngrazed:FireUnburnt 224.5099 153.17048 396 1.465752 0.1435
> GrazingUngrazed:Year -104.4984 28.99989 396 -3.603406 0.0004
> FireUnburnt:Year -21.3375 38.52046 396 -0.553927 0.5799
> GrazingUngrazed:FireUnburnt:Year 85.2475 44.47663 396 1.916680 0.0560
>
>
> My concern is:
> Does my model specification looks ok?
> Is Phi = 0 real and what does this mean (in all case studies I have seen, it had value different from zero)?
> I am also wondering about the identical degree of freedom for all term (except for Year).
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> With regards,
>
> Djibril.
>
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list