[R-sig-ME] New to LMER with 2 (easy?) questions...
Rolf Turner
r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
Thu May 21 23:17:55 CEST 2009
On 22/05/2009, at 9:14 AM, Hank Stevens wrote:
> HI Rolf,
> The BLOCK numbers should reflect their "true" underlying nature.
> These data would suggest that Site and Block are crossed because e.g.
> BLOCK 1 exists at two sites:
> SITE BLOCK
> 1 1
> 1 2
> 1 3
> 2 1
> 2 2
> 2 3
>
> These data would suggest that Blocks are unique (and therefore
> necessarily nested within Sites):
> SITE BLOCK
> 1 1
> 1 2
> 1 3
> 2 4
> 2 5
> 2 6
That's what I thought. But it's the opposite of what Ben Bolker said.
Unless, of course, I'm totally confused.
cheers,
Rolf
######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list