[R-sig-ME] [R] AIC value in lmer
bates at stat.wisc.edu
Sat Nov 8 21:56:39 CET 2008
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:03 AM, <ARNAUD_MOSNIER at uqar.qc.ca> wrote:
> Dear R Users,
> May be this message should be directy send to Douglas Bates ...
> I just want to know if I can use the AIC value given in the output of an lmer model to classify my logistic models.
> I heard that the AIC value given in GLIMMIX output (SAS) is false because it come from a calculation based on pseudo-likelyhood.
> Is it the same for lmer ???
I don't know about the situation with SAS. The AIC value returned by
lmer is based on an approximation to the integral of the conditional
density of the random effects. I had thought that I could evaluate
that conditional density from the sum of the deviance residuals for
the glm family but, given some recent discussion on the
R-SIG-Mixed-Models mailing list regarding the quasibinomial and
quasipoisson families, i am starting to doubt that.
So the quantity that is returned is based on something that is more
like the likelihood than is the pseudo-likelihood but may not be the
I do plan to change the value returned to be the likelihood for the
gaussian, binomial, poisson and Gamma families. I don't know what to
do about the quasi families. As far as I can see there isn't a
likelihood for those families because they don't represent a
I am cc:ing the R-SIG-Mixed-Models mailing list on this reply. I
suggest we move further discussion, if any, to that list.
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models