[R-sig-ME] fitting models with poisson distributed data
Page E. Van Meter
vanmete7 at msu.edu
Tue Oct 28 13:20:37 CET 2008
Thanks, Ken. I am coming to a similar conclusion. My data is very zero
inflated and I have considered using negative binomial, which also does
not seem to work with lmer.
I will try working on both quasipoisson and a binomial version of my
data. Thanks,
-Page
Ken Beath wrote:
> On 25/10/2008, at 9:37 AM, Page E. Van Meter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Now that I have the code figured out, I hoping for some help on
>> defining my model. I might be guilty of trying to fit an overly
>> complex model to my data, although my model seems very simple in
>> comparison to what has been discussed here. I'm hoping for feedback
>> on my model design. Thanks in advance!
>>
>> I have some pretty ugly longitudinal data measuring hormones and
>> behaviors from individual hyenas over many years (355 samples from 39
>> individuals). We collect hormone samples based on opportunity and
>> have several samples from each individual (3-9 samples per hyena). My
>> ultimate goal is to see if my hormone data explains any of the
>> variation we see in the behavior data (aggression, I'll call it
>> aggs). My dependent measurement is a behavior rate, count of aggs
>> over time just prior to hormone sample collection. It is very zero
>> heavy (lots of individuals did not aggress prior to hormone sample
>> donation) and resistant to transformation to normality, but seems to
>> be a pretty poisson distribution. My predictors are hormones and
>> reproductive state (pregnant or lactating, which effect both
>> aggression and hormones).
>>
>
> From the output the estimated scale (I don't see this in the version
> of lmer I'm using?) is 7.7 so data is definitely not Poisson.
> Assuming Poisson will give incorrect p values.
>
> Seeing the quasi Poisson doesn't seem to work properly I'm not certain
> what is a good choice. I haven't tried it but maybe quasi Poisson
> works in one of the GEE packages.
>
> It may be Ok to limit the analysis to no aggression/aggression
> allowing fitting as binomial data.
>
> Ken
>
>
>> m2<-lmer(aggs~reprostate+hrm1+hrm2+(1|id), family=poisson, aggs)
>>
>> Generalized linear mixed model fit using Laplace
>> Formula: aggs ~ reprostate + hrm1 + hrm2 + (1 | id)
>> Data: aggs
>> Family: poisson(log link)
>> AIC BIC logLik deviance
>> 12369 12387 -6179 12359
>> Random effects:
>> Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
>> id (Intercept) 4.9353 2.2216 number of obs: 307, groups: id, 39
>>
>> Estimated scale (compare to 1 ) 7.682887
>>
>> Fixed effects:
>> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept)
>> -3.07625 0.39575 -7.773 7.65e-15 ***
>> reprostate 2.32056 0.07724 30.044 < 2e-16 ***
>> hrm1 0.12575 0.04020 3.128 0.00176 **
>> hrm2 -0.80434 0.04770 -16.862 < 2e-16 ***
>> ---
>>
>> Correlation of Fixed Effects:
>> (Intr) statct ecent
>> statecat -0.381 ecent -0.085 0.271 acent
>> 0.136 -0.339 -0.079
>>
>> --
>> ************************************
>> Page E. Van Meter
>> Michigan State University
>> Department of Zoology
>> vanmete7 at msu.edu
>> **http://msu.edu/~vanmete7/*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>>
>
>
--
************************************
Page E. Van Meter
Michigan State University
Department of Zoology
vanmete7 at msu.edu
**http://msu.edu/~vanmete7/*
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list