[R-sig-ME] Speed estimation for lmer?
Daniel Ezra Johnson
danielezrajohnson at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 23:06:49 CEST 2008
>> Roughly speaking: lmer and lmer2 aren't (I think) different any more,
>> they were different branches of the same software. They should both
>> be much faster than lme. glmer (from lme4) and glmmPQL (from nlme)
>> should not be necessary unless you have binomial, Poisson, etc. data
>> rather than normally distributed responses.
> Ben is correct. There are functions lmer and lmer2 in the current
> lme4 package but lmer2 is just a stub that turns around and calls
> lmer. If your response y is on a continuous scale then it should be
> lmer that you use.
so if my response is on a continuous scale, is there any difference between
the output is the same but since reading the above i'm wondering if
'plain' lmer is written to run faster?
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models