[R-sig-ME] Error: "Cannot get confidence intervals...", with lme, what does it means?
Rafael Maia
queirozrafaelmv at yahoo.com.br
Fri Sep 5 00:19:19 CEST 2008
Hello!
Sorry to keep this going, but could you elaborate on the meaning of
that output? I am asking this because I am trying to model my data
set, and with the same model, I get that output if I use REML, but I
get a normal output if I use ML - so I'm assuming it may be related to
the model, but also in the estimating method. The intervals calculated
using intervals() under the ML method are very similar to the ones I
obtain when computing them by hand.
Under my limited knowledge, I believe I am using the most appropriate
model for my data, even though it is definitely not a "good" one for
the data (which is inherently unbalanced).
Commands follow, below. Many thanks for any help!
Best,
Rafael
> intervals(m1)
Error in intervals.lme(m1) :
Cannot get confidence intervals on var-cov components: Non-positive
definite approximate variance-covariance
> m1<-update(m1, method="ML")
> intervals(m1)
Approximate 95% confidence intervals
Fixed effects:
lower est. upper
(Intercept) 0.2268163 1.318894 2.4109708
factor(Status)2 0.7653039 1.812026 2.8587479
Ano -1.7888219 -1.112453 -0.4360846
attr(,"label")
[1] "Fixed effects:"
Random Effects:
Level: ind
lower est. upper
sd((Intercept)) 1.692475e-02 0.9802002 56.76849
sd(factor(Status)2) 2.009503e-05 0.8586423 36689.01183
cor((Intercept),factor(Status)2) -1.000000e+00 -0.8485173 1.00000
Within-group standard error:
lower est. upper
3.685400e-14 3.630675e-01 3.576762e+12
On 2 Sep 2008, at 11:09, Gang Chen wrote:
> Cotter,
>
> Check the following component
>
>> lmefit1$apVar
>
> If you see something like this
>
> [1] "Non-positive definite approximate variance-covariance"
>
> it most likely indicates you have an inappropriate model for the
> data. Try plotting out the data, and get some idea about the
> feasible models, and then fit the data with those models.
>
> Cheers,
> Gang
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:29 AM, R.S. Cotter wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In some occasions I get this error message: "Cannot get confidence
>> intervals on var-cov components: Non-positive definite approximate
>> variance-covariance".
>>
>> I have tried to figure out this by using help function, but didn't
>> find answer to the question. I address this question with describing
>> the model and the primary task that I want to solve. Sorry if the
>> question is clumsy formulated, I 'm not that experienced with R and
>> statistics.
>>
>> My model is:
>> Response= Weight(continous)
>> Explanatory variables= Time (continous) and Diet (kategorical, two
>> groups; B&C)
>>
>> The primary question of interest is wheter the growth rates
>> (Weight/Time) differ among the two diets.
>>
>> lmefit1<-lme(Weight ~ Diet*Time,random=~1|Place,data=Total)
>>
>> Summary output is ok, so far so good. But I also wanted to get the
>> slope and confidence intervals for the growth rates for both diets
>> (B&C), so I ran intervals(). And I got the intercept, slope and
>> confidence intervals for diet B, see below.
>>
>> But I also wanted the same for the diet C, to do this I renamed
>> diet C
>> to A in the data sheet to force C to be the dummy variable. Is this
>> the right way to do it?
>>
>> When running the intervals () once again, I got this message: "Cannot
>> get confidence intervals on var-cov components: Non-positive definite
>> approximate variance-covariance". What could be wrong..? Is there
>> other ways to get the slope and confidence intervals from a lme
>> model?
>>
>>> intervals(lmefit1)
>> Approximate 95% confidence intervals
>>
>> Fixed effects:
>> lower est.
>> upper
>> (Intercept) 66.040673 108.122242 150.203810
>> DietC -175.080336 -109.638518 -44.196700
>> Time 4.177387 5.434087 6.690788
>> DietC:Time 7.938101 11.180806 14.423511
>> attr(,"label")
>> [1] "Fixed effects:"
>>
>> Random Effects:
>> Level: Place
>> lower est. upper
>> sd((Intercept)) 0.1478599 13.50651 1233.775
>>
>> Within-group standard error:
>> lower est. upper
>> 159.9128 174.8928 191.2761
>>
>> Best regards Cotter
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list