[R-sig-ME] lmer vs lmer2 vs AD Model Builder RE
dave fournier
otter at otter-rsch.com
Sun Oct 7 07:43:14 CEST 2007
As a further thought on robust estimation for
mixed models I fit the full data set with
a model based on a 95% mixture of a normal distribution
and a 5% Cauchy distribution I obtained the
parameter estimates:
real_b -1.9405e+000 9.5807e-002
real_b 1.6089e+000 3.2403e-002
real_b 2.0168e-002 1.3129e-003
real_b 1.8537e-001 1.1414e-001
real_b -1.7127e-002 7.7816e-003
compared to the estimates from R with the
outlier removed.
(Intercept) -1.948119 0.095877 -20.32
Height 1.640650 0.032800 50.02
Age 0.019379 0.001310 14.79
InitHeight 0.143977 0.111043 1.30
InitAge -0.014618 0.007501 -1.95
They are almost identical for statistical purposes.
Also by restricting the parameterization of the full covariance matrix
for the random effects slightly we are able to estimate it
which speaks to the stability of the AD Model builder Random Effects
software.
David A. Fournier
P.O. Box 2040,
Sidney, B.C. V8l 3S3
Canada
Phone/FAX 250-655-3364
http://otter-rsch.com
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list