[R-meta] Questions metafor random slope
Mathias Weis Damkjær
mwd@mkj@er @end|ng |rom he@|th@@du@dk
Fri Nov 8 15:50:23 CET 2024
Hello everyone,
I have a few questions about a more complicated model specification in metafor.
I have also created a stackoverflow thread with no replies yet here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79165730/random-slopes-and-intercepts-in-the-metafor-package-model-specification-and-out
I have read the e-mail correspondence: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/2019-August/001650.html with interest.
However, I do have some questions.
1. Question 1:
The model specification:
* res <- rma.mv(logOR, logOR.var, mods = ~ CF1_Women..IMP, random = list(~ CF1_Women..IMP | id, ~ 1 | row), struct="GEN", data=d)
Adds a multilevel structure AND random slopes for the covariate within meta-analyses.
I was wondering why one should not specify the model with: ~ 1 | id/row as the last element in the list of random-effects? That is the notation for instance in the lme4 package.
1. Question 2:
The tau2 estimates (variance components) from this model:
Variance Components:
estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
sigma^2 X X X no trial_id
outer factor: id (nlvls = X)
inner term: ~factor (nlvls = X)
estim sqrt fixed rho: intr c_SP
intrcpt X X no - X
factor X X no no -
Sigma2 is for trial_level.
Is it correct that �intrcpt� is for the meta-analyses level?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Mathias, Phd. Student
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list