[R-meta] "Favours experimental/vaccinated", "Favours control" - Metafor

[Andrzej Andrzej]

My sincere apologies, I will be more careful with checking to reply to this
forum as well, like I always do.
Thank you for your reply this is what I wanted.
best
Andrzej

czw., 2 lis 2023 o 09:54 Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) <
wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl> napisał(a):

> Dear Andrzej,
>
> Please always respond to the mailing list, not just the person who you are
> replying to.
>
> You can use:
>
> summary(dat2, transf=exp)
>
> See the documentation:
>
> https://wviechtb.github.io/metafor/reference/print.escalc.html
>
> Best,
> Wolfgang
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrzej Andrzej <xaf3111.developers using gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 09:25
> > To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) <
> wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl>
> > Subject: Re: [R-meta] "Favours experimental/vaccinated", "Favours
> control" -
> > Metafor
> >
> > That's true, thank you,
> > I want to have RR as well ( all in one dataframe). When I do this:
> > dat2 <- escalc(measure = "RR", ai = tpos, bi = tneg, ci = cpos, di =
> cneg, data
> > = dat.bcg, append = TRUE) %>% mutate(RR = exp(.$yi))
> >
> > It gives me Relative Risk and then when I  do: summary(dat2) indeed I
> have got
> > CIs for log(RR) but there are no CIs for RR.
> > Do I have to calculate them manually  ? Or is it a way to extract them
> from
> > forest plot object somehow ?
> > best,
> > Andrzej
> >
> > czw., 2 lis 2023 o 08:53 Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP)
> > <mailto:wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl> napisał(a):
> > If you use summary() on an 'escalc' object, you get the CIs.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wolfgang
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrzej Andrzej <mailto:xaf3111.developers using gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 19:39
> > > To: Michael Dewey <mailto:lists using dewey.myzen.co.uk>
> > > Cc: R Special Interest Group for Meta-Analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis using r-
> > > http://project.org>; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP)
> > > <mailto:wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl>
> > > Subject: Re: [R-meta] "Favours experimental/vaccinated", "Favours
> control" -
> > > Metafor
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Is there a way using escalc function to get CI for log RR as well,
> apart from
> > > log RR itself ?
> > > I would like to get RR with CI too. Is it a way to do it and append it
> all to
> > > bcg data ?
> > > bets,
> > > Andrzej
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]