[R-meta] using netmeta::netsplit()
Dr. Gerta Rücker
gert@@ruecker @end|ng |rom un|k||n|k-|re|burg@de
Wed Dec 20 19:26:56 CET 2023
Hi Dale,
I don't know the answer to your question (perhaps Guido has an idea), but there is a different way to (hopefully) shorten your output. By
> forest(ns1, only.reference = TRUE)
you see the results only for comparisons with the reference treatment.
Best,
Gerta
UNIVERSITÄTSKLINIKUM FREIBURG
Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics
Dr. Gerta Rücker
Guest Scientist
Stefan-Meier-Straße 26 · 79104 Freiburg
gerta.ruecker using uniklinik-freiburg.de
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/imbi-en/employees.html?imbiuser=ruecker
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dale Steele via R-sig-meta-analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org>
Gesendet: Samstag, 16. Dezember 2023 00:29
An: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
Cc: Dale Steele <dale.w.steele using gmail.com>
Betreff: [R-meta] using netmeta::netsplit()
I'm doing a network meta-analysis, using netmeta (v2.9-0). There are a
large number
of potential comparisons in my network.
My current plot displays all comparisons (too many) where
least one study contributes direct evidence.
ns1 <- netsplit(net1)
forest(ns1, show = "both")
My goal is to produce a forest plot showing only comparisons for which there
are at least 3 studies with direct evidence.
I think I want the 7 comparisons where k > 2
> which(ns1$k > 2)
[1] 120 127 130 132 147 237 253
Thanks!
--Dale
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list @ R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
To manage your subscription to this mailing list, go to:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list