[R-meta] Posting to this list
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n|
Tue Mar 29 23:36:49 CEST 2022
Dear Gerta,
I don't think I am bashing anybody and I am sorry if it came across this way. Anybody is free to post here. It's just nice to know who I am conversing with, especially if a post is addressing me directly.
Best,
Wolfgang
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dr. Gerta Rücker [mailto:ruecker using imbi.uni-freiburg.de]
>Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 23:21
>To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP); Stefanou Revesz
>Cc: R meta
>Subject: Re: [R-meta] Posting to this list
>
>Dear Wolfgang,
>
>I read your recent post on these more general rules for the list and I
>agree with most of them. However, I have a problem with this bashing of
>people who do not have an official address. I worked for full 12 years
>as a German Hausfrau from home. I was nowhere affiliated, but
>nevertheless published as a researcher, together with my husband and his
>colleagues. At that time I even didn't have an e-mail address. Now I am
>retired, and when my contract as a guest scientist will end, I will lose
>my e-mail address and my affiliation and, if these are the rules, will
>not be allowed to post on this list. Please be aware that there are
>people who retire, or get unemployed, but still do research.
>
>In short, why does it matter where we are affiliated?
>
>Best,
>
>Gerta
>
>Am 29.03.2022 um 22:54 schrieb Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP):
>> Is there any way this can be verified? Easiest would be to use your UCL account
>to post.
>>
>> Best,
>> Wolfgang
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Stefanou Revesz [mailto:stefanourevesz using gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 22:27
>>> To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>>> Cc: R meta
>>> Subject: Re: [R-meta] Exponentiating the fixed part of rma.mv output
>>>
>>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> I'm a second second year master's student in psychology at the
>>> University College of London. I don't currently own a social media
>>> platform or personal website (I certainly should set up one for myself
>>> when I start to publish!). To be clear, are you asking that I should
>>> add this information to my signature at the bottom of my gmail in my
>>> future posts, correct?
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Stefanou
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>>> <wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
>>>> Dear Stefanou,
>>>>
>>>> When posting to the mailing list, please provide some information about any
>>> institutional/organizational affiliation (such as a link to a personal
>website,
>>> university profile page, or social media profile). Thanks!
>>>> Best,
>>>> Wolfgang
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces using r-project.org]
>>> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Stefanou Revesz
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 21:43
>>>>> To: R meta
>>>>> Subject: [R-meta] Exponentiating the fixed part of rma.mv output
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to exponentiate the fixed part of my model below, is there a
>>>>> way to preserve the appearance of the output as in
>>>>> `coef(summary(res))` but just display all the columns in their
>>>>> exponentiated form?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did try `predict(res, transf = exp)` but that is not what I'm after.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Stefanou
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Here is my model:
>>>>> d <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fpqq/w/main/f.csv")
>>>>>
>>>>> res <- rma.mv(gi ~ teaching_level+pd_format +pd_content +
>>>>> training_hr +time +outcome +area +
>>>>> time_wk_whn +time_wk_btw +study_type,
>>>>> V = v_gi,
>>>>> random = ~1|study/obs,
>>>>> data = d)
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list