[R-meta] Does clubSandwich::coef_test() handle crossed random-effects?
Farzad Keyhan
|@keyh@n|h@ @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Oct 4 04:25:19 CEST 2021
Dear James,
I explored the issue, there was a re-coding bug. One thing that I wanted to
clarify is that in addition to the 'scale > study' nesting relationship,
the same 'scale' was used to measure different 'outcomes' and different
'scales' can be used to measure the same 'outcome' across the studies.
Do you see any potential for crossed random-effects here? (data attached
for clarity)
Fred
dat <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ilzl/i/master/j.csv")
study scale yi vi es group outcome time
1 A1 p1 1.680746 0.2081713 1 1 3 0
2 A1 p1 4.122057 0.4806029 2 2 3 0
3 A1 p1 2.600443 0.2838905 3 1 3 1
4 A1 p1 3.457194 0.3836960 4 2 3 1
5 A1 p1 1.546293 0.1998273 5 1 3 2
6 A1 p1 3.071523 0.3352741 6 2 3 2
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 6:59 PM James Pustejovsky <jepusto using gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 1:18 PM Farzad Keyhan <f.keyhaniha using gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I see, I'm still exploring to see what has caused the two models in my
>> previous email to give slightly different fits. Still curious though, for
>> 'scale' and 'study' to have been crossed random effects, 'scale' should
>> have varied in each study?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list