[R-meta] robumeta and wald_test
Cátia Ferreira De Oliveira
cm|o500 @end|ng |rom york@@c@uk
Thu Aug 19 15:28:22 CEST 2021
Hello,
Just a follow-up.
Apologies for not adding the mailing list to the email.
I am planning many contrasts, they could be accomplished by subgrouping the
data but not sure if that's a good approach. What I am aiming to accomplish
is to determine whether there are
a) any differences between the TD group and DD/DLD groups for grammar,
vocabulary and phonology;
b) comparing whether the effect for grammar, phonology and vocabulary == 0;
c) pairwise comparisons of the effect for grammar, phonology and vocabulary
to see if they are different;
d) check whether the correlation is different from 0 for the reference
level (TD) for each component - grammar, vocabulary, phonology (not sure if
I would need to run a different model for this one).
The reference level is the TD group, there are three groups (TD, DD and
DLD) and three components (grammar, vocabulary and phonology).
*component <- robu(formula = yi ~ 0 + Component + Group:Component, data =
df,*
* studynum = Study, var.eff.size = vi,*
* rho = .8, small = TRUE)*
*print(component)*
*RVE: Correlated Effects Model with Small-Sample Corrections*
*Model: yi ~ 0 + Component + Group:Component*
*Number of studies = 34*
*Number of outcomes = 305 (min = 1 , mean = 8.97 , median = 4 , max = 48 )*
*Rho = 0.8*
*I.sq = 47.09732**Tau.sq = 0.02458387*
* Estimate StdErr t-value dfs P(|t|>) 95%
CI.L 95% CI.U Sig*
*1 ComponentGrammar 0.05897 0.0456 1.293 11.45 0.2217
-0.0410 0.1589 *
*2 ComponentPhonology -0.00383 0.0356 -0.108 8.05 0.9169
-0.0857 0.0781 *
*3 ComponentVocabulary 0.09662 0.0592 1.631 5.35 0.1600
-0.0527 0.2460 *
*4 ComponentGrammar.GroupDD 0.03277 0.0590 0.555 1.05 0.6740
-0.6412 0.7068 *
*5 ComponentPhonology.GroupDD 0.01557 0.0929 0.168 5.60 0.8728
-0.2159 0.2470 *
*6 ComponentVocabulary.GroupDD -0.16516 0.0592 -2.788 5.35 0.0358
-0.3145 -0.0158 ***
*7 ComponentGrammar.GroupDLD -0.08097 0.0819 -0.989 14.99 0.3386
-0.2556 0.0936 *
*8 ComponentPhonology.GroupDLD 0.35854 0.1760 2.037 5.77 0.0897
-0.0763 0.7934 **
*9 ComponentVocabulary.GroupDLD -0.10642 0.0692 -1.537 9.94 0.1555
-0.2608 0.0480 *
*---*
*Signif. codes: < .01 *** < .05 ** < .10 **
*---*
*Note: If df < 4, do not trust the results*
Thank you! I am a bit new to using the constraints.
Best wishes,
Catia
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list