[R-meta] Random effects structure
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n|
Wed Mar 25 18:25:18 CET 2020
The Berkey code doesn't quite apply here. This is more relevant:
http://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/analyses:gleser2009#multiple-treatment_studies
But your splitting variable is 'exp' within 'Site', so you need to first create a variable that is the combination of the two. This should do it:
dat$Site.exp <- paste0(dat$Site, ".", dat$exp)
Also make sure that the data are sorted accordingly:
dat <- dat[order(dat$Site, dat$exp),]
Then:
calc.v <- function(x) {
v <- matrix(x$NPSD^2[1] / (x$NPN[1] * dat$NP[1]^2), nrow=nrow(x), ncol=nrow(x))
diag(v) <- x$var
v
}
V <- bldiag(lapply(split(dat, dat$Site.exp), calc.v))
You should double-check that the blocks in V are correct (with 'var' along the diagonal and the correct covariances along the off-diagonal) before trying to fit the model.
Best,
Wolfgang
-----Original Message-----
From: César Terrer [mailto:cesar.terrer using me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 March, 2020 16:21
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Random effects structure
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for your quick response.
I have never constructed a V matrix. Based on the Berkey tutorial, I have tried to apply the following
dat$v2i <- dat$NPSD^2 / (dat$NPN*dat$NP^2)
V <- bldiag(lapply(split(dat[,c("var", "v2i")], dat$exp), as.matrix))
res <-rma.mv(yi=lnR, V=V, random=~1|Site/exp/obs, mods=~Predator, data=dat)
But it gives me an error that 'V' must be a square matrix. Is this because the split in V has to be done at the "obs" level? I used "exp" because that indicates the level at which all effect sizes use the same control.
Thank you
Cesar
On March 25, 2020 at 7:44 AM, "Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)" <wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Hi Cesar,
When the same group is used to compute multiple estimates (i.e., a common control), then this also induces dependency on the sampling errors. For the log response ratio, the covariance is then:
SD_C^2 / (n_C*M_C^2)
where M_C and SD_C are the mean and SD of the common control group and n_C the control group size.
So, you ideally should construct a proper V matrix that includes these covariances and that you can then pass to rma.mv().
But yes, random=~1|Site/exp/obs would be sensible.
Best,
Wolfgang
-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces using r-project.org] On Behalf Of César Terrer
Sent: Wednesday, 25 March, 2020 15:34
To: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
Subject: [R-meta] Random effects structure
Dear community,
I am conducting a meta-analysis to study the growth rate of bacterial predators as compared to their prey, using the log response ratio. Furthermore, I want to study if this effect varies across different predators. The dataset has the following structure, here showing a subset:
Site CommonControl exp obs Predator lnR var
A Alaska 155 1 1 Bdello -0.6713152 0.03785708
A Alaska 155 1 2 Cytoph -0.0702467 0.05763364
A Alaska 155 1 3 Myxo -0.148982 0.00748768
A Alaska 1510 2 4 Bdello -0.4926361 0.01691187
A Alaska 1510 2 5 Cytoph -0.213787 0.01045785
B Andesite1controlWeek1 9 6 Bdello 0.27873598 0.14129722
B Andesite1controlWeek1 9 7 Cytoph -0.3243682 0.01466085
B Andesite1controlWeek1 9 8 Lyso 1.18302506 0.11663149
B Andesite1controlWeek6 11 9 Bdello -0.8465128 0.03701618
B Andesite1controlWeek6 11 10 Cytoph -0.1559056 0.0283173
B Andesite1controlWeek6 11 11 Lyso -0.8039415 0.04926915
1. There are different sites, thus a potential source of non-independency
2. Within each site, we use the value for preys in the denominator multiple times. I guess rows of data using the same denominator (CommonControl) are also potentially correlated and should be also added as a random-effect.
Based on 1., 2., and what I have understood from the Konstantopoulos (2011) tutorial, I think I should use the following model:
res <-rma.mv(yi=lnR, V=var, random=~1|Site/exp/obs, mods=~Predator, data=data)
Could you please let me know if the structure of random effects seems appropriate, and help me understand why I need to include "obs"?
Thank you.
Cesar
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list