[R-meta] Subgroup analysis with RVE
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n|
Thu Dec 3 10:10:15 CET 2020
Yes, adding this variable as a covariate is indeed meta-regression with a dichotomous predictor. This assumes that the amount of heterogeneity is the same within the two subgroups. If you subgroup, then you automatically allow the amount of heterogeneity to differ between the two groups. This is discussed here:
When combining this with RVE, things are a bit different though. RVE doesn't make assumptions about the underlying variance structure (in fact, the whole point of RVE is that it works (asymptotically) even if the var-cov structure is misspecified). So, even if tau^2 differs across the two groups, RVE in the context of a meta-regression model is still going to provide valid inferences.
>From: Ioana Cristea [mailto:ioana.alina.cristea using gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, 03 December, 2020 9:31
>To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [R-meta] Subgroup analysis with RVE
>Thank you, sorry I did not explain clearly. I estimated effects within
>subgroups with RVE (intercept only model in each), but I did not do a
>between-groups test of significance. I did fit a model with a between groups
>covariate (subgroups coded dichotomously: high/low), which I took to be the
>equivalent of a meta-regression with a dichotomous predictor.
>On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:20 AM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
><wolfgang.viechtbauer using maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
>I am not sure why you think that a test of that moderators is not useful
>when the number of effect sizes is so different between the two groups. All
>else equal, power will indeed be lower as opposed to the case where k is
>similar for the two groups, but that will be the case no matter how you
>analyze the data (via meta-regression or subgrouping).
>This aside, I am a bit confused by your question. A subgroup analysis is
>just that: Fitting a particular model in a subgroup of the studies. That can
>be done with or without RVE. You seem to have done this already ("I
>estimated effects in the high and low subgroup separately").
>>From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces using r-
>>On Behalf Of Ioana Cristea
>>Sent: Wednesday, 25 November, 2020 15:43
>>To: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
>>Subject: [R-meta] Subgroup analysis with RVE
>>I am running a meta-analysis with robust variance estimation (RVE) and my
>>focus is on a categorical variable (a risk of bias domain variable, coded
>>dichotomously, high vs low, in the database "0" for low risk and "1" for
>>high risk). I estimated effects in the high and low subgroup separately,
>>each in an intercept only model. I also ran the RVE model estimating the
>>between-study effect of covariates, including my predictor (which is a
>>between study variable) as a covariate (it was not significant). I think a
>>big problem is that the two subgroups delineated by the categorical
>>variable are very uneven in terms of the information contained (one has 45
>>effect sizes, one 13) and in my view a test of significance for differences
>>between them is not useful.
>>One of my co-authors would also like us to run a subgroup analysis. I am
>>not sure how to do that, if it is possible with RVE and if it adds anything
>>to the model estimating between-study covariates, which I already ran.
>>Ioana-Alina Cristea, Ph.D.
>>Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences
>>University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy
>>METRICS (Meta-research Innovation Center at Stanford)
>>Stanford University, California, USA
>>Editorial Advisory Board Lancet Psychiatry
>>International Editorial Board BJPsych Open
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis