[R-meta] Open Data: preferred way of publishing

Moritz Tobiasch moritztobiasch at gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 16:19:05 CET 2018

Dear colleagues,

I have not a primary technical question, but I think it is worth asking the experts:

I am currently finishing on a meta-analysis, preparing for publication. I intend to publish my set of primary data (it’s been quite some work, and I guess it could be helpful to review and discuss on the topic). Primary data were collected in a (I know, I apologize for it …) Excel spreadsheet before being imported to R, and analysis was run in Rstudio in a Markup file.

My question is now: based on your experience and preferences, what would be your ideal way to make the primary dataset and the calculations accessible for review and further research? Add it to the article as supplemental material, upload it to arxiv, GitHub, or just on my website?

Any suggestions are welcome!

Sincerely yours
M. Tobiasch

Dr. med. Moritz Tobiasch
Staff Physician

Universitätskliniken LKH Innsbruck
Dept. of Medicine
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Anichstr. 35
A-6020 Innsbruck

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20180127/311c4607/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20180127/311c4607/attachment.sig>

More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list