[R-meta] FE Model
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
wolfg@ng@viechtb@uer @ending from m@@@trichtuniver@ity@nl
Sun Dec 23 18:43:39 CET 2018
Could you provide a reproducible example illustrating the issue?
This works just fine:
yi <- c(.1, .2, .3)
vi <- rep(.01, 3)
res <- rma(yi, vi, method="FE")
Maybe tau^2 is estimated to be zero in your case? Then the plot will look the same, except for the labeling:
res <- rma(yi, vi)
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces using r-project.org] On Behalf Of Julie Webbs
Sent: Sunday, 23 December, 2018 18:23
To: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] FE Model
Sorry i meant I get the RE Model
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:18 PM Julie Webbs <webbsjulie using gmail.com> wrote:
> I have set method = "FE" in rma(), but in the forest plot , I get the RM
> Model, and the results do not change when I use method = "FE" in metafor.
> Is it a bug or I missed something?
> Any help?
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis