[R-meta] Binomial Effect Size Display?
markhwhiteii at gmail.com
Sat Jul 15 15:35:33 CEST 2017
Many meta-analyses will take their smaller-than-they-would-have-hoped
summary effect size and make it look bigger by using Rosenthal and Rubin's
(1982) binomial effect size display:
have always thought this is a misleading metric. Someone asked a question 5
years ago on CrossValidated about it, and I tried to answer it with a
(this post provides a good, short summary of the original paper and the
metric, if you are unfamiliar with it).
I'm more of a simulate-and-see-if-it-works type of person—is there anyone
who understands more of the math behind *why* this metric might be
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis