On Aug 31, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Kjell Konis wrote:

> I have both the gcc3.4.4 compilers and the gcc4.0.1 compilers.  When
> I use 3.4.4 the configure script does not link against the blas in
> vecLib but it does when I use 4.0.1.  However, I remember seeing an
> email here that said use the 3.4.x compilers unless you have a good
> reason not to (and the good reason was wanting a 64 bit build which I
> don't).  Is this still the prevailing wisdom?  I want a safe, stable,
> useable build.  Is it better to use 3.4.4 w/o vecLib or 4.0.1 w/  
> vecLib?

I do not know about vecLib, but I was recommended to use gcc 3, so I  
would say it is still the prevailing wisdom. As I am using a stock  
Tiger that would be gcc 3.3

Kasper


> PS Is it possible to search the r-sig-mac archives?

I do not know. If not we should look into google indexing them. I  
have seen something like that with other mailing lists.
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

