[R-SIG-Mac] Transitioning from Mac to LInux?
Hervé Pagès
hp@ge@ @end|ng |rom |redhutch@org
Wed Apr 1 21:27:52 CEST 2020
My 2 cents: Just go for the inexpensive desktop + Linux. Debian-based or
RedHat-based distros are great for developing R/Bioconductor packages.
I've been maintaining/troubleshooting package builds on
Linux/Windows/Mac for 15 years and Linux is **by far** the easiest
platform to deal with. Still a mystery to me why one would choose macOS
for developing R/Bioconductor packages.
H.
On 4/1/20 11:48, Carl Witthoft wrote:
>
> If I should ask over at r-sig-debian instead of here, please tell me.
> I don't wish to clog r-sig-mac with off-topic stuff.
>
>
> I've been watching the massive headaches people are dealing with trying
> to keep R fully compatible with each MacOS X upgrade, I'm wondering
> whether replacing my iMac (2009) with a new Mac really makes sense from
> an R - user point of view, as opposed to getting some inexpensive
> desktop and installing Linux. I know I can run R and RStudio under
> Linux, for example, but don't know what limitations, if any there are
> when it comes to building packages from source, getting compatible
> compilers, and so on.
>
> What have some of you 'power R users' discovered when/if you tried to
> build , or incorporate Bioconductor or other repository's packages under
> Linux?
>
>
--
Hervé Pagès
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpages using fredhutch.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
More information about the R-SIG-Mac
mailing list