[R-SIG-Mac] Compiler options for R binary

Brandon Hurr brandon.hurr at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 03:30:26 CET 2014


Simon.

  It's been a while since I've looked but are there precise instructions on
how to implement your BTW?

Brandon.

On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org>
wrote:

> On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Braun, Michael <braunm at mail.smu.edu
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > I run R on a recent Mac Pro (Ivy Bridge architecture), and before that,
> on a 2010-version (Nehalem architecture).  For the last few years I have
> been installing R by compiling from source.  The reason is that I noticed
> in the etc/Makeconf file that the precompiled binary is compiled with the
> -mtune=core2 option.  I had thought that since my system uses a processor
> with a more recent architecture and instruction set, that I would be
> leaving performance on the table by using the binary.
> >
> > My self-compiled R has worked well for me, for the most part. But
> sometimes little things pop-up, like difficulty using R Studio, an
> occasional permissions problem related to the Intel BLAS, etc.  And there
> is a time investment in installing R this way.  So even though I want to
> exploit as much of the computing power on my desktop that I can, now I am
> questioning whether self-compiling R is worth the effort.
> >
> > My questions are these:
> >
> > 1.  Am I correct that the R binary for Mac is tuned to Core2
> architecture?
> > 2.  In theory, should tuning the compiler for Sandy Bridge (SSE4.2, AVX
> instructions, etc) generate a faster R?
>
> In theory, yes, but often the inverse is true (in particular for AVX).
>
>
> > 3.  Has anyone tested the theory in Item 2?
> > 4.  Is the reason for setting -mtune=core2 to support older machines?
> If so, are enough people still using pre-Nehalem 64-bit Macs to justify
> this?
>
> Only partially. In fact, the flags are there explicitly to increase the
> tuning level - the default is even lower. Last time I checked there were no
> significant benefits in compiling with more aggressive flags anyway. (If
> you want to go there, Jan De Leeuw used to publish most aggressive flags
> possible). You cannot relax the math ops compatibility which is the only
> piece that typically yields gain, because you start getting wrong math op
> results. You have to be very careful with benchmarking, because from
> experience optimizations often yield speed ups in some areas, but also
> introduce slowdown in other areas - it's not always a gain (one example on
> the extreme end is AVX: when enabled some ops can even take twice as long,
> believe it or not...) and even the gains are typically in single digit
> percent range.
>
>
> > 5.  What would trigger a decision to start tuning the R binary for a
> more advanced processor?
> > 6.  What are some other implications of either self-compiling or using
> the precompiled binary that I might need to consider?
> >
>
> When you compile from sources, you're entirely on your own and you have to
> take care of all dependencies (libraries) and compilation yourself. Most
> Mac users don't want to go there since they typically prefer to spend their
> time elsewhere ;).
>
> BTW: if you really care about speed, the real gains are with using
> parallel BLAS, Intel OpenMP runtime and enabling built-in threading support
> in R.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> > tl;dr:  My Mac Pro has a Ivy Bridge processor.  Is it worthwhile to
> compile R myself, instead of using the binary?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Michael Braun
> > Associate Professor of Marketing
> > Cox School of Business
> > Southern Methodist University
> > Dallas, TX 75275
> > braunm at smu.edu <javascript:;>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-SIG-Mac mailing list
> > R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org <javascript:;>
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Mac mailing list
> R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org <javascript:;>
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-SIG-Mac mailing list